|
|
|---|
|
American Politics Journal Atrios Barry Crimmins Betty Bowers Buzzflash Consortium News Daily Howler Daily Kos Democatic Underground Disinfotainment Today Evil GOP Bastards Faux News Channel Gene Lyons Greg Palast The Hollywood Liberal Internet Weekly Jesus General Joe Conason Josh Marshall Liberal Oasis Make Them Accountable Mark Morford Mike Malloy Political Humor - About.com Political Wire Randi Rhodes Rude Pundit Smirking Chimp Take Back the Media Whitehouse.org More Links |
I never thought I would say this but, I would really like former President Bill Clinton to shut up. Over the last week Bill has been whining left and right about how the other Democratic candidates for president and a certain debate moderator have been treating his wife Hillary.
Bill has whined that Hillary was swift boated over her views on the governor of New York's driver's license plan for illegal immigrants. Well, if Bill thinks that Tim Russert the moderator at the debate was swift boating poor Hillary in some way then he really didn't pay much attention to the 2004 presidential race. Hillary Clinton had said at an earlier time that she supported New York Governor Switzer's plan to give licenses to illegal immigrants. At the last debate she refused to give that answer or any answer when asked about it by moderator Tim Russert, who kept after he for an answer. Any politician should understand that if you say something one day then a few days refuse to say it again or give a completely different answer, those actions are open to scrutiny. Scrutiny can be a little tough during a presidential race and Bill Clinton of all people should know that.
Then there was the comment by Bill Clinton that the boys were ganging up on the girl (Hillary). Well again Bill should know that when you are the front runner the rest of the candidates are going to come after you and there attacks certainly have nothing to do with gender. The other candidates were doing exactly what they should be doing, trying to put holes in the front runner's sails.
I must say I am truly disappointed in Bill. I understand he yearns to return to the White House even as First Gentleman but this kind of stuff is embarrassing. Does Bill think that Hillary is not tough enough to withstand the attacks? If that is the case then Hillary and Bill should pack up and go home because the Republicans are certainly going to be a lot tougher in the general election with her if she is the nominee than her Democratic rivals are now.
Dan, November 14, 2007
I was watching a program on the Pentagon Channel, which is basically reruns of old US propaganda films. It was amusing until they were disparaging Hitler for holding trials where the defendants were refused representation, witnesses, evidence or any other form of defense. I thought, it is so great that we went to war to stop this sort of mad dictatorship from spreading around the world. Then I remembered Bush.
Of course there are many other similarities between the two fascists:
Nazis demonized the Jews. The Republicans are going after Hispanics.
Hitler ignored all international treaties. Bush does likewise.
Hitler used the Reichstag to institute a massive right wing drive to take complete control of Germany and turn it into a one party dictatorial government. Bush uses the World Trade Center.
Hitler instituted a massive propaganda campaign to frighten Germans with the idea that Germany was in danger. Bush, dittos,
Hitler launched a murderous invasion of Czechoslovakia, Bush slaughtered tens of thousands in Iraq.
Hitler went after Poland, Finland, Denmark and Holland. Bush sets his sights on Iran and Syria. The rest of the Middle East to follow?
Hitler placed the the Gestapo above the law and turned it into a wing of the Nazi party. Bush is doing the same with the FBI and the CIA.
Hitler had the SS. Bush has Blackwater.
Hitler set up brutal concentration camps. Bush opens Guantanamo.
Hitler opens secret prisons where he gleefully tortures his perceived enemies. Bush clicks his heels in unison.
Hitler was very smart. Uh oh. Bush is a moron sock puppet for Cheney, the Dick.
Wow! It was getting scary there for awhile. Thank goodness that we have a strong opposition party to stop this madness in the bud.
Oh fuck!
In Today's Tequila Treehouse...
| Why We Write | |
| The Cheney Threat |
|
| Musharraf - Bush clone | |
| Cheney likes to kill |
|
| Syphlitic chimps | |
| Obama's moment |
|
| Why I hate Hillary... |
|
| Vet Suicides Way Up | |
| Kelly Ripa-licious |
Steve Bensen, The Carpetbagger Report, November 14, 2007
Following up an item from last week, Georgia is in the midst of an awful drought, and state officials are running out of ideas to deal with the area's water shortage. Georgia Gov. Sonny Perdue (R) responded by organizing a multi-denominational prayer service, in which state officials and clergy would collectively ask The Man Upstairs to turn on the water works.
Bowing his head outside the Georgia Capitol on Tuesday, Gov. Sonny Perdue cut a newly repentant figure as he publicly prayed for rain to end the region's historic drought.
"Oh father, we acknowledge our wastefulness," Perdue said. "But we're doing better. And I thought it was time to acknowledge that to the creator, the provider of water and land, and to tell him that we will do better."
Yes, in the 21st century, we have a state's chief executive bargaining with God for rain. (The governor didn't say, "If you give us rain, we'll be good," but he came close.) Perdue implicitly conceded that the state has been negligent in its conservation efforts - his administration saw this coming, but decided not to pursue more stringent conservation measures - but apparently wants God to give Georgia another chance.
Perdue said after the event that Georgians have not done "all we could do in conservation" and that the drought was an attempt by God to "get our attention."
Read More Here
Sidney Blumenthal, Salon, November 15, 2007
Editor's note: Sidney Blumenthal is joining the Hillary Clinton campaign as a senior advisor, and this is his last column for Salon.
Under crisis conditions of an extraordinary magnitude political leadership of the highest level will be required in the next presidency. The damage is broad, deep and spreading, apparent not only in international disorder and violence, the unprecedented decline of U.S. prestige, and the flouting of our security and economic interests but also in the hollowing out of the federal government's departments and agencies, and their growing incapacity to fulfill their functions, from FEMA to the Department of Justice.
The more rigid the current president is in responding to the chaos he has fostered, the more the Republicans still supporting him rally around him as a pillar of strength. His flat learning curve, refusal to admit error and redoubling of mistakes are regarded as tests of his strong character. Whatever his low poll ratings of the moment, his stubborn adherence to failure is admired as evidence of his potency.
The patently perverse notion that weakness is strength is the basis of Bush's remaining credibility within his party. His abuse of presidential power is seen as his great asset rather than understood as his enduring weakness. But when the president assumes all the responsibility, he also receives all the blame, which becomes unitary and unilateral. Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson stated the constitutional principle in the 1952 Youngstown Steel case: "When the President takes measures incompatible with the expressed or implied will of Congress, his power is at its lowest ebb. Presidential claim to a power at once so conclusive and preclusive must be scrutinized with caution, for what is at stake is the equilibrium established by our constitutional system."
In his waning year, Bush is pointedly indifferent to the predictable consequences of his collapse. According to those who have met with him recently, he envisions himself as a noble idealist having made moral decisions that will vindicate him generations from now.
Despite the obvious shortcomings of his policies, he has startlingly succeeded in reshaping the executive into an unaccountable imperial presidency. And Bush's presidency is now accepted as the only acceptable version for major Republican candidates who aspire to succeed him. All of them have pledged to extend its arbitrary powers. Their embrace of the imperial presidency makes the 2008 election a turning point in constitutional government.
Read More Here 