|
|
|---|
|
American Politics Journal Atrios Barry Crimmins Betty Bowers Buzzflash Consortium News Daily Howler Daily Kos Democatic Underground Disinfotainment Today Evil GOP Bastards Faux News Channel Gene Lyons Greg Palast The Hollywood Liberal Internet Weekly Jesus General Joe Conason Josh Marshall Liberal Oasis Make Them Accountable Mark Morford Mike Malloy Political Humor - About.com Political Wire Randi Rhodes Rude Pundit Smirking Chimp Take Back the Media Whitehouse.org More Links |

Paul Krugman, The New York Times, December 31, 2007
Yesterday The Times published a highly informative chart laying out the positions of the presidential candidates on major issues. It was, I'd argue, a useful reality check for those who believe that the next president can somehow usher in a new era of bipartisan cooperation. For what the chart made clear was the extent to which Democrats and Republicans live in separate moral and intellectual universes. On one side, the Democrats are all promising to get out of Iraq and offering strongly progressive policies on taxes, health care and the environment. That's understandable: the public hates the war, and public opinion seems to be running in a progressive direction. What seems harder to understand is what's happening on the other side — the degree to which almost all the Republicans have chosen to align themselves closely with the unpopular policies of an unpopular president. And I'm not just talking about their continuing enthusiasm for the Iraq war. The G.O.P. candidates are equally supportive of Bush economic policies. Why would politicians support Bushonomics? After all, the public is very unhappy with the state of the economy, for good reason. The "Bush boom," such as it was, bypassed most Americans — median family income, adjusted for inflation, has stagnated in the Bush years, and so have the real earnings of the typical worker. Meanwhile, insecurity has increased, with a declining fraction of Americans receiving health insurance from their employers. Read More Here
Bill Boyarsky, TruthDig, December 26, 2007
DES MOINES, Iowa - This may be the last place in America where political journalists are embraced as heroes.
Usually these reporters, particularly those in the mainstream media, take hits from academia and a growing number of media critics. In Iowa, they are eagerly welcomed when they show up to cover the state's unique system of selecting presidential nominees. The reason is simple: The media is a co-conspirator in a con, the Iowa caucuses.
I covered the first highly publicized Iowa caucuses in 1976, when unknown Jimmy Carter finished ahead of all the Democratic candidates and went on to win the Democratic presidential nomination and the presidency. We reporters found the unfamiliar system a welcome change from what we usually covered. Iowans were friendly and eager to talk, and the caucuses were peculiar but intriguing. After the caucuses, I moved on to the next stop, the New Hampshire primary, not giving any more thought to the Iowa system. That's a reporter for you: Out of sight, out of mind.
In the intervening years, my career took a turn toward covering city councils, boards of supervisors, fixers, angry community leaders, lobbyists and the rest of the cast that makes local politics compelling. Down in the muck of real politics, I became more cynical. I learned that everybody has an angle, and you have to understand the system to know it for what it is. As I prepared to fly to Iowa on this current assignment, I wondered if I'd be able to figure out what the angle was for caucus participants.
I talked to a lot of people here, but oddly enough, I learned more from Iowa's State Historical Museum, where there is a large display that explains a lot about the caucuses.
Read More Here "The nation's retailers slashed prices further Wednesday in hopes that a post-Christmas shopping rush will salvage holiday sales that, so far, have fallen below even modest expectations. They're waiting in particular for legions of shoppers armed with gift cards to snap up bargains and buy new merchandise that has just hit store shelves." [...] "Meanwhile a broad gauge of consumer spending released by Mastercard Advisors -- a division of the credit card company -- that includes estimates for spending by check and cash, reported Tuesday an increase of 3.6 percent from Nov. 23 to Dec. 24, the low end of expectations. That compared with a 6.6 percent gain in the year-ago period. Excluding gas purchases, holiday sales were up only 2.4 percent." -- "After Christmas, shops try to lure scrooges," AP, Dec. 26, 2007.Next crisis on the block joining the housing collapse? Credit industry failures as strapped families can't pay their ballooning credit card debt racked up during the holidays. Save that coal you got in your stocking -- you may need it for heat. (Read a great piece on this looming crisis by Danny Schechter here.) -- Rudy Giuliani goes into the hospital overnight for "flu-like symptoms" and a tremendous headache? Huh? What healthy adult male spends the night in the doc shop for that? Aside from a testament to Rudy's rich-man health insurance -- no average American would be able to cajole their HMO into paying for an overnight hospital stay with the flu and a headache: "Take two aspirins and drink plenty of fluids -- and stay home!" -- this sounds, even to People Who Only Play Doctors On TV, like he had at least a mild stroke. Considering the baffling nature of some of his recent TV ads, like that bizarre 'Christmas fruitcake' flopperoo, perhaps he's had more than one. Forget the Grover Cleveland Official Campaign Denials that he's fine -- Rudy may be dropping out of the race for health reasons any day now. No doubt the G-Man is under a lot of pressure after pissing away a thirty-point lead with his obnoxious personality and shady past. Adding to his other ethical problems, he now is accused of peddling his reputation to prevent prosecutions of the makers of OxyContin for lying to the public. -- New Conspiracy Theory: Could it be that the Big Media is intentionally prolonging the writer's strike to keep the late night talk shows, as well as the irreverent slice-and-dice satirizations on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert, in reruns and therefore unable to jape the GOP candidates and the White House? (Too many Americans, to our national discredit, get their 'news' from the talk shows.) Hard to imagine, but then so is Junior as president. -- Finally, Lou Dobbs: Rather than prove he's not a racist, perhaps TV's most rabid anti-illegal immigrant ranter -- he now seems to devote half of his show to his eye-rolling ravings on the subject -- merely married a Mexican woman to torture her.
Robert Parry, Consortium News, December 28, 2007
The chaos spreading across nuclear-armed Pakistan after the assassination of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto is part of the price for the Bush administration's duplicity about al-Qaeda's priorities, including the old canard that the terrorist group regards Iraq as the “central front” in its global war against the West.
Through repetition of this claim - often accompanied by George W. Bush's home-spun advice about the need to listen to what the enemy says - millions of Americans believe that Osama bin Laden and other al-Qaeda leaders consider Iraq the key battlefield.
However, intelligence evidence, gathered from intercepted al-Qaeda communications, indicate that bin Laden's high command views Iraq as a valuable diversion for U.S. military strength, not the "central front."
For instance, as the Iraq War was heating up in 2005, a letter attributed to al-Qaeda's second-in-command Ayman al-Zawahiri asked if the embattled al-Qaeda operatives in Iraq might be able to spare $100,000 to relieve a cash squeeze facing the group's top leaders in hiding, presumably inside Pakistan near the Afghan border.
Instead of money going from Pakistan to Iraq, the cash was flowing the opposite way. U.S. intelligence analysts recognized that this was not the way one would normally treat a "central front."
Read More Here RAWALPINDI, Pakistan - Pakistan opposition leader Benazir Bhutto was assassinated Thursday in a suicide bombing that also killed at least 20 others at a campaign rally, a party aide and a military official said."At 6:16 p.m. she expired," said Wasif Ali Khan, a member of Bhutto's party who was at Rawalpindi General Hospital where she was taken after the attack.A senior military official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to comment, confirmed that Bhutto had died. Her supporters at the hospital began chanting "Dog, Musharraf, dog," referring to Pakistan's president Pervez Musharraf. Some of them smashed the glass door at the main entrance of the emergency unit, others burst into tears.Bhutto is dead. You can think whatever you will about her, but no matter what else she was, no matter how truly pure she was to the cause of democracy, she was a symbol of opposition and she's been removed. This is a bad thing.
