<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Tattlesnake – Debunking Five Current Media Myths Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=10428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=10428</link>
	<description>The Blog of BartCop.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 04:36:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RS Janes</title>
		<link>https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=10428&#038;cpage=1#comment-46804</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RS Janes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=10428#comment-46804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We agree, db, but I saw the Channel 8 clips on MSNBC, a national cable network. Also saw the clips of John Ralston on same, a local Las Vegas reporter who interviewed Sharron Angle.

We agree on this, too: &lt;em&gt;&quot;My point then is that the Congressional races are below the media radar, even the local media, and so the “wing-nuttery” of the Republican Candidates will not be noticed in their barrage of positive advertisements.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

As I wrote longwindedly in my piece: &lt;em&gt;&quot;Only in those areas of the country dominated by Fox News and AM radio right-wing talkers, and not much counter-balancing local media, where the Teabaggers could work without serious scrutiny, did they score wins, mostly against Blue Dog Dems.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

How do we fight back? That&#039;s a good quesrion, but I think after a year of the GOP running things even further into the ground, we won&#039;t have to fight much; like Junior&#039;s sliding polls, it will become obvious to the majority that what they are hearing from the Right-Wing Noisemakers doesn&#039;t comport with their miserable Depression-era reality. I think Obama might lose next time around if he &#039;stays the course&#039; of weak &#039;bipartisan&#039; caving to the GOP he&#039;s been on, but so will the GOP and the Blue Dogs Dems, mayhap opening up the field for real progressives and even true conservatives to take office.

Perhaps we&#039;ll actually get change we can believe in, but not in the way Obama intended.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We agree, db, but I saw the Channel 8 clips on MSNBC, a national cable network. Also saw the clips of John Ralston on same, a local Las Vegas reporter who interviewed Sharron Angle.</p>
<p>We agree on this, too: <em>&#8220;My point then is that the Congressional races are below the media radar, even the local media, and so the “wing-nuttery” of the Republican Candidates will not be noticed in their barrage of positive advertisements.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>As I wrote longwindedly in my piece: <em>&#8220;Only in those areas of the country dominated by Fox News and AM radio right-wing talkers, and not much counter-balancing local media, where the Teabaggers could work without serious scrutiny, did they score wins, mostly against Blue Dog Dems.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>How do we fight back? That&#8217;s a good quesrion, but I think after a year of the GOP running things even further into the ground, we won&#8217;t have to fight much; like Junior&#8217;s sliding polls, it will become obvious to the majority that what they are hearing from the Right-Wing Noisemakers doesn&#8217;t comport with their miserable Depression-era reality. I think Obama might lose next time around if he &#8216;stays the course&#8217; of weak &#8216;bipartisan&#8217; caving to the GOP he&#8217;s been on, but so will the GOP and the Blue Dogs Dems, mayhap opening up the field for real progressives and even true conservatives to take office.</p>
<p>Perhaps we&#8217;ll actually get change we can believe in, but not in the way Obama intended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: db</title>
		<link>https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=10428&#038;cpage=1#comment-46802</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[db]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=10428#comment-46802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you, but I wasn&#039;t just speaking of national media attention. Do you remember the film clips of Sharon Angle literally running away from the Channel 8 Reporter? There is another clip of her answering Channel 8&#039;s questions with &quot;Fire Harry Reid&quot;. Can you see Channel 8 spending such time on Congressional races? This is the local Las Vegas TV station.

My point then is that the Congressional races are below the media radar, even the local media, and so the &quot;wing-nuttery&quot; of the Republican Candidates will not be noticed in their barrage of positive advertisements.

How do we fight that? Are we doomed to ever more &quot;Republi-Corp&quot; Congressmen?

What does it say about America &amp; Americans when you can assert that Fox has mis-informed a significant proportion of the voters?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, but I wasn&#8217;t just speaking of national media attention. Do you remember the film clips of Sharon Angle literally running away from the Channel 8 Reporter? There is another clip of her answering Channel 8&#8242;s questions with &#8220;Fire Harry Reid&#8221;. Can you see Channel 8 spending such time on Congressional races? This is the local Las Vegas TV station.</p>
<p>My point then is that the Congressional races are below the media radar, even the local media, and so the &#8220;wing-nuttery&#8221; of the Republican Candidates will not be noticed in their barrage of positive advertisements.</p>
<p>How do we fight that? Are we doomed to ever more &#8220;Republi-Corp&#8221; Congressmen?</p>
<p>What does it say about America &amp; Americans when you can assert that Fox has mis-informed a significant proportion of the voters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RS Janes</title>
		<link>https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=10428&#038;cpage=1#comment-46801</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RS Janes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=10428#comment-46801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re right, db. The Senate races had much more national media coverage than most of the House races, so voters got to see how batty the Teabaggers were and $40-plus million in corpo cash just wasn&#039;t enough to make Sharron Angle look sane. This broke down in just two high-profile races: Russ Feingold in WI and Alan Grayson in FL. In both cases, the GOP spent lavishly on the Republican opponent, and each progressive Dem was targeted for defeat but, for some reason, there wasn&#039;t much national media attention focused on the GOP candidate.

Also, in California, non-Teabagging Republicans Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina outspent Barbara Boxer and Jerry Brown by wide margins, and Whitman&#039;s TV ads were 24/7 for the last couple of months before the election. How could Republicans who could afford a lot of TV time lose in a state that installed Schwarzenfluffer as governor?  I think it was four things: a) The state is just &#039;Republicaned out&#039;; b) Whitman&#039;s crappy, self-serving treatment of her Latina housekeeper; c) Fiorina&#039;s condescending &#039;just folks&#039; speech after drinking a shot of tequila at an Hispanic function; d) Jerry Brown&#039;s brilliant last-minute TV ads showing Whitman parroting Ah-nuld word-for-word. (The Obama DeeCee Dems could learn something from Brown&#039;s campaign.)

How did the TARP bailouts, etc, become Obama&#039;s problem? By the magic of Fox Noose mendacity, mostly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, db. The Senate races had much more national media coverage than most of the House races, so voters got to see how batty the Teabaggers were and $40-plus million in corpo cash just wasn&#8217;t enough to make Sharron Angle look sane. This broke down in just two high-profile races: Russ Feingold in WI and Alan Grayson in FL. In both cases, the GOP spent lavishly on the Republican opponent, and each progressive Dem was targeted for defeat but, for some reason, there wasn&#8217;t much national media attention focused on the GOP candidate.</p>
<p>Also, in California, non-Teabagging Republicans Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina outspent Barbara Boxer and Jerry Brown by wide margins, and Whitman&#8217;s TV ads were 24/7 for the last couple of months before the election. How could Republicans who could afford a lot of TV time lose in a state that installed Schwarzenfluffer as governor?  I think it was four things: a) The state is just &#8216;Republicaned out&#8217;; b) Whitman&#8217;s crappy, self-serving treatment of her Latina housekeeper; c) Fiorina&#8217;s condescending &#8216;just folks&#8217; speech after drinking a shot of tequila at an Hispanic function; d) Jerry Brown&#8217;s brilliant last-minute TV ads showing Whitman parroting Ah-nuld word-for-word. (The Obama DeeCee Dems could learn something from Brown&#8217;s campaign.)</p>
<p>How did the TARP bailouts, etc, become Obama&#8217;s problem? By the magic of Fox Noose mendacity, mostly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: db</title>
		<link>https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=10428&#038;cpage=1#comment-46800</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[db]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 21:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=10428#comment-46800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d suspect that the vast amounts of secret corporate money the Republicans spent worked better in Congressional rather than Senatorial races. The Senatorial races are &quot;media worthy&quot; and so the advertising has a (pseudo) objective standard to work against. The Congressional races usually are under the radar.

Additionally the Republicans are much more adept at getting the slogans out. The stimulus plan, the bank bailouts, these were Bush policies. How did they pass them to the Democrats?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d suspect that the vast amounts of secret corporate money the Republicans spent worked better in Congressional rather than Senatorial races. The Senatorial races are &#8220;media worthy&#8221; and so the advertising has a (pseudo) objective standard to work against. The Congressional races usually are under the radar.</p>
<p>Additionally the Republicans are much more adept at getting the slogans out. The stimulus plan, the bank bailouts, these were Bush policies. How did they pass them to the Democrats?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
