Comments on: Sarah Palin: Slouching Back to Methlehem

By: RS Janes

RS Janes — Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:13:20 +0000

We should know in a year and a half or so.

By: db

db — Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:40:31 +0000

As has been said, “That’s why God made horse races”.

I’ll be counting out the wins for you. Sister Sarah has to get to 5.

By: RS Janes

RS Janes — Sun, 12 Dec 2010 20:35:09 +0000

Include the caucuses for the Wasilla caucasian. I think she’ll probably win Iowa and that will be it — she’ll be buried by GOP money after that.

By: db

db — Sun, 12 Dec 2010 11:44:06 +0000

Yes, something along the Olive Garden level is fine.

Do we get to include caucases in the 5 victory total or am I strictly held to primaries?

By: RS Janes

RS Janes — Sun, 12 Dec 2010 09:10:38 +0000

That sounds like an Olive Garden kind of place, db. Is that what you were thinking of?

By: db

db — Sat, 11 Dec 2010 23:36:41 +0000

Well, I was thinking of someplace where they don’t ask if we’d like Fries with the order, but well below any place that has a wine list in French.

By: RS Janes

RS Janes — Sat, 11 Dec 2010 23:18:12 +0000

I agree with you on No. 1, db: I think she will run, but people will be so sick of her and her whole fam-damily by that time that I don’t think she’ll win any primaries, or one at most. I guess we have a bet. (And when you say ‘affordable restaurant,’ I hope you mean fast food.

By: db

db — Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:41:00 +0000

Okay, We disagree here. So:

A dinner at an affordable restaurant says:

1. Sarah will run for President in the 2012 election.
2. She will win at least 5 Republican primaries.

You may cover the bet on either or both.