<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The new definition of crazy: Our wars on Afghanistan, Libya, Iraq &amp; drugs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=11133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=11133</link>
	<description>The Blog of BartCop.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 04:36:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RS Janes</title>
		<link>https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=11133&#038;cpage=1#comment-46883</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RS Janes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 23:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bartblog.bartcop.com/2011/04/04/the-new-definition-of-crazy-our-wars-on-afghanistan-libya-iraq-drugs/#comment-46883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everything you say is true, Jane, particularly regarding the insanity of blaming unions when it&#039;s the Walmart/Koch Bros. corporatists who have been &#039;outsourcing&#039; the jobs overseas and are responisible for the economic mess we&#039;re in. Also, I have known a couple of folks who are in the same shape re worker&#039;s comp -- it seems to be a policy enacted during Bush Junior&#039;s reign to just automatically deny any claim, no matter how valid, hoping you&#039;ll go away. It&#039;s the same thing they&#039;ve been doing with unemployment comp -- some corporations now hire firms to challenge unemployment comp filings, knowing that a certain number will give up, or won&#039;t attend the hearing. (It happened to a friend of mine; she had to attend two hearings before she got unemployment, even though she was laid off.)

On the matter of why we&#039;re in Af-Pak, you just have to look at it from the corporatists point of view -- they have been making billions from this BS &#039;war&#039; and they don&#039;t much care who has to die or go without a limb to secure their profits. If tomorrow morning a law were passed that no company could make a profit from Af-Pak, just cover their costs, the &#039;war&#039; would be over by afternoon. That&#039;s one of the reasons I call the system we&#039;re living under &#039;crapitalism.&#039;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything you say is true, Jane, particularly regarding the insanity of blaming unions when it&#8217;s the Walmart/Koch Bros. corporatists who have been &#8216;outsourcing&#8217; the jobs overseas and are responisible for the economic mess we&#8217;re in. Also, I have known a couple of folks who are in the same shape re worker&#8217;s comp &#8212; it seems to be a policy enacted during Bush Junior&#8217;s reign to just automatically deny any claim, no matter how valid, hoping you&#8217;ll go away. It&#8217;s the same thing they&#8217;ve been doing with unemployment comp &#8212; some corporations now hire firms to challenge unemployment comp filings, knowing that a certain number will give up, or won&#8217;t attend the hearing. (It happened to a friend of mine; she had to attend two hearings before she got unemployment, even though she was laid off.)</p>
<p>On the matter of why we&#8217;re in Af-Pak, you just have to look at it from the corporatists point of view &#8212; they have been making billions from this BS &#8216;war&#8217; and they don&#8217;t much care who has to die or go without a limb to secure their profits. If tomorrow morning a law were passed that no company could make a profit from Af-Pak, just cover their costs, the &#8216;war&#8217; would be over by afternoon. That&#8217;s one of the reasons I call the system we&#8217;re living under &#8216;crapitalism.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
