<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Tattlesnake &#8212; It&#8217;s Not All About the O&#8217;s Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=2128</link>
	<description>The Blog of BartCop.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 04:36:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rainlander</title>
		<link>https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=2128&#038;cpage=1#comment-7324</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rainlander]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 16:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bartblog.bartcop.com/2008/01/02/the-tattlesnake-its-not-all-about-the-os-edition/#comment-7324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After reading the above posts,I realised that
grace and eloquence is what made me proud to be an american and what I&#039;ve missed about her politics for the past thirty years.

One conjecture I&#039;d like to make however is that if the Iraq war debt had been invested in solar and wind farms then the need for convential power generation would be nearly obsolete in this country,but i guess the payback on the investment is too slow for the stockholders.

There is some very,very promising alternative energy research going on right now.
One fellow is working on Bio-diesel from algae,
with yields a thousand fold over fuel from agriculture based bio-fuel including AE-85.

Here is a link to pes-wiki one of my favorite hobby sites:
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Biodiesel_from_Algae_Oil

In Canada several large cartage firms use Brown
gas generators to suplement their tractor/trailers or semies as they call them,
The hydrogen and oxygen content allows for a 25 to 50% more complete fuel burn which in turn reduces consumption and emmisions and they get a tax-credit for using them.
Here is a link for the DIY tinkerers:
http://pureenergysystems.com/store/Hydrogen-Boost/

Right now CNG is about the most practical vehicle fuel source with a cost per gallon of about .90 cents and an optimised vehicle is much more efficient due to the caloric energy  but the conversions are expensive, five to fifteen thousand depending on the size of the vehicle.
Should this become common though the price should drop dramatically.

I see a lot to be optimistic about out there on the horizon but the good things are going to come at a price,I guess the real question is:
Is discourse and diplomacy too high a price to pay for the embetterment of Humanity and Mother Earth?

You Guys brightened My day,Thank You.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading the above posts,I realised that<br />
grace and eloquence is what made me proud to be an american and what I&#8217;ve missed about her politics for the past thirty years.</p>
<p>One conjecture I&#8217;d like to make however is that if the Iraq war debt had been invested in solar and wind farms then the need for convential power generation would be nearly obsolete in this country,but i guess the payback on the investment is too slow for the stockholders.</p>
<p>There is some very,very promising alternative energy research going on right now.<br />
One fellow is working on Bio-diesel from algae,<br />
with yields a thousand fold over fuel from agriculture based bio-fuel including AE-85.</p>
<p>Here is a link to pes-wiki one of my favorite hobby sites:<br />
<a href="http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Biodiesel_from_Algae_Oil" rel="nofollow">http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Biodiesel_from_Algae_Oil</a></p>
<p>In Canada several large cartage firms use Brown<br />
gas generators to suplement their tractor/trailers or semies as they call them,<br />
The hydrogen and oxygen content allows for a 25 to 50% more complete fuel burn which in turn reduces consumption and emmisions and they get a tax-credit for using them.<br />
Here is a link for the DIY tinkerers:<br />
<a href="http://pureenergysystems.com/store/Hydrogen-Boost/" rel="nofollow">http://pureenergysystems.com/store/Hydrogen-Boost/</a></p>
<p>Right now CNG is about the most practical vehicle fuel source with a cost per gallon of about .90 cents and an optimised vehicle is much more efficient due to the caloric energy  but the conversions are expensive, five to fifteen thousand depending on the size of the vehicle.<br />
Should this become common though the price should drop dramatically.</p>
<p>I see a lot to be optimistic about out there on the horizon but the good things are going to come at a price,I guess the real question is:<br />
Is discourse and diplomacy too high a price to pay for the embetterment of Humanity and Mother Earth?</p>
<p>You Guys brightened My day,Thank You.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RS Janes</title>
		<link>https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=2128&#038;cpage=1#comment-7320</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RS Janes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bartblog.bartcop.com/2008/01/02/the-tattlesnake-its-not-all-about-the-os-edition/#comment-7320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Grim, I have some conservative friends who want clean water and air as well -- they also like to fish and hunt and are appalled at what has happened to some of their favorite spots -- one stream is practically dead from factory run-off that used to be crystal clear, and a Wisconsin deer forest is now being cut down to make way for another tourist attraction they don&#039;t need.

I have no kick with real conservatives, although I might not agree with them about everything -- it&#039;s the crazy neocons I can&#039;t stand. Real conservatives care about the Constitution, conservation, obeying the law, taking responsibility for your actions, keeping the government off your back, avoiding stupid wars, and not lying and cheating to get your way. Real conservatives have principles and argue sanely.

Neocons, on the hand, are nearly exactly the opposite of that -- they lie and cheat and smear to get an advantage, and they have no moral scruples of any kind that I can discern. Means to an end is their only edict, and the means don&#039;t matter. Winning is the only thing to them, but they forget the rest of that Vince Lombardi quote that says you must win fairly and in a sportsmanlike way. There is little difference between a neocon and a Stalinist, as far as I&#039;m concerned.

I had some respect for Barry Goldwater and even William F. Buckley because they seemd to be honest and sincere and had thought through their positions. And if they criticized someone, they&#039;d have the guts to do it to their face, and not through surrogates.

I don&#039;t see that in most of the current crop of right-wingers, although I still think P.J. O&#039;Roarke is funny, but then, he&#039;s not a neocon.

If you&#039;re a conservative Republican, I hope you purge your party of the corporate swindlers, Swift Boat liars, and Christopublican nitwits and bring it back to something that Barry Goldwater would be proud to join.

BTW, with both oil and nuclear power we&#039;re going to have big problems in the future: the oil is running out and storing the radioactive material -- that&#039;s hot for ten thousand years -- is a risk. You saw what happened with Chernobyl, and that was just a mild leak. The quicker we go to alternative sources of power -- wind, solar, hydrogen -- the better off we&#039;ll be. The only reason we don&#039;t have more of this now is because the multi-national corporations haven&#039;t figured out yet how to bill us for the wind and the sun.

You have a good day, too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grim, I have some conservative friends who want clean water and air as well &#8212; they also like to fish and hunt and are appalled at what has happened to some of their favorite spots &#8212; one stream is practically dead from factory run-off that used to be crystal clear, and a Wisconsin deer forest is now being cut down to make way for another tourist attraction they don&#8217;t need.</p>
<p>I have no kick with real conservatives, although I might not agree with them about everything &#8212; it&#8217;s the crazy neocons I can&#8217;t stand. Real conservatives care about the Constitution, conservation, obeying the law, taking responsibility for your actions, keeping the government off your back, avoiding stupid wars, and not lying and cheating to get your way. Real conservatives have principles and argue sanely.</p>
<p>Neocons, on the hand, are nearly exactly the opposite of that &#8212; they lie and cheat and smear to get an advantage, and they have no moral scruples of any kind that I can discern. Means to an end is their only edict, and the means don&#8217;t matter. Winning is the only thing to them, but they forget the rest of that Vince Lombardi quote that says you must win fairly and in a sportsmanlike way. There is little difference between a neocon and a Stalinist, as far as I&#8217;m concerned.</p>
<p>I had some respect for Barry Goldwater and even William F. Buckley because they seemd to be honest and sincere and had thought through their positions. And if they criticized someone, they&#8217;d have the guts to do it to their face, and not through surrogates.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see that in most of the current crop of right-wingers, although I still think P.J. O&#8217;Roarke is funny, but then, he&#8217;s not a neocon.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re a conservative Republican, I hope you purge your party of the corporate swindlers, Swift Boat liars, and Christopublican nitwits and bring it back to something that Barry Goldwater would be proud to join.</p>
<p>BTW, with both oil and nuclear power we&#8217;re going to have big problems in the future: the oil is running out and storing the radioactive material &#8212; that&#8217;s hot for ten thousand years &#8212; is a risk. You saw what happened with Chernobyl, and that was just a mild leak. The quicker we go to alternative sources of power &#8212; wind, solar, hydrogen &#8212; the better off we&#8217;ll be. The only reason we don&#8217;t have more of this now is because the multi-national corporations haven&#8217;t figured out yet how to bill us for the wind and the sun.</p>
<p>You have a good day, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grimgold</title>
		<link>https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=2128&#038;cpage=1#comment-7292</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[grimgold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 05:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bartblog.bartcop.com/2008/01/02/the-tattlesnake-its-not-all-about-the-os-edition/#comment-7292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RS, thank you for the very kind reply concerning the piece I posted several days ago. 
I&#039;m surprised you may not think conservative repubs don&#039;t value the environ. Myself I&#039;m a rabid trout stream fisherman and I suppose I have a liberal slip which shows when environment is mentioned. 
But I want to see a balance. For example, I want to see drilling in ANWAR, but let&#039;s also have the Sierra Club monitoring the activity to make sure no environ damage is taking place, or that all environmental replacement will take place when oil is gone.
I want nuclear power, but also want responsible use and storage of residue. 
I want more water storage built in Ca. but I also want the Hetch-hetchy Dam torn down to create another Yosemite.
Enough. Have an excellent day. 
Grimmy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RS, thank you for the very kind reply concerning the piece I posted several days ago.<br />
I&#8217;m surprised you may not think conservative repubs don&#8217;t value the environ. Myself I&#8217;m a rabid trout stream fisherman and I suppose I have a liberal slip which shows when environment is mentioned.<br />
But I want to see a balance. For example, I want to see drilling in ANWAR, but let&#8217;s also have the Sierra Club monitoring the activity to make sure no environ damage is taking place, or that all environmental replacement will take place when oil is gone.<br />
I want nuclear power, but also want responsible use and storage of residue.<br />
I want more water storage built in Ca. but I also want the Hetch-hetchy Dam torn down to create another Yosemite.<br />
Enough. Have an excellent day.<br />
Grimmy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tsumbra</title>
		<link>https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=2128&#038;cpage=1#comment-7287</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tsumbra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 02:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bartblog.bartcop.com/2008/01/02/the-tattlesnake-its-not-all-about-the-os-edition/#comment-7287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Senator Larry Craig Goes Down to Iowa&quot;
www.ilovepoetry.com/viewpoem.asp?id=94289
Eyes on the BIG prize?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Senator Larry Craig Goes Down to Iowa&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.ilovepoetry.com/viewpoem.asp?id=94289" rel="nofollow">http://www.ilovepoetry.com/viewpoem.asp?id=94289</a><br />
Eyes on the BIG prize?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
