<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Fraud of Bushenomics: They’re Looting the Country</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=2356</link>
	<description>The Blog of BartCop.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 04:36:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RS Janes</title>
		<link>https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=2356&#038;cpage=1#comment-7628</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RS Janes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bartblog.bartcop.com/2008/01/19/the-fraud-of-bushenomics-they%e2%80%99re-looting-the-country/#comment-7628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even the aptly-named Arthur Laffer, who sketched out the Laffer Curve on a bar napkin and was a strong Supply Side/Trickle Down theory economist, finally admitted none of this crap works in practice.

Reagan&#039;s economy was so successful that Bush 41 had to raise taxes to pay off his deficit; Junior&#039;s continuation-with-a-vengeance of Reagan&#039;s economic monstrosity -- the idea that &quot;deficits don&#039;t matter&quot; and you can just borrow your way out of trouble while cutting taxes and building up the military -- has led us down the path to third-world nation status. 

Seems that China and the EU will be the economic superpowers of the next twenty years, and maybe during that time we&#039;ll elect some people with the sense of an eight-year-old to handle the economy and we can bail ourselves out.

But I wouldn&#039;t bet on it, even in Declining Dollars.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even the aptly-named Arthur Laffer, who sketched out the Laffer Curve on a bar napkin and was a strong Supply Side/Trickle Down theory economist, finally admitted none of this crap works in practice.</p>
<p>Reagan&#8217;s economy was so successful that Bush 41 had to raise taxes to pay off his deficit; Junior&#8217;s continuation-with-a-vengeance of Reagan&#8217;s economic monstrosity &#8212; the idea that &#8220;deficits don&#8217;t matter&#8221; and you can just borrow your way out of trouble while cutting taxes and building up the military &#8212; has led us down the path to third-world nation status. </p>
<p>Seems that China and the EU will be the economic superpowers of the next twenty years, and maybe during that time we&#8217;ll elect some people with the sense of an eight-year-old to handle the economy and we can bail ourselves out.</p>
<p>But I wouldn&#8217;t bet on it, even in Declining Dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rainlander</title>
		<link>https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=2356&#038;cpage=1#comment-7624</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rainlander]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 05:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bartblog.bartcop.com/2008/01/19/the-fraud-of-bushenomics-they%e2%80%99re-looting-the-country/#comment-7624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The idea under which Bushenomics was sold is this:

* The rich are the investor class.
* If the rich have more money, they will invest more.
* Their investments will create more business.
* Those businesses will create more wealth, thus improving everyone’s lives and making the nation stronger. They will also create new and better jobs.

================================================
If the buisness model states the above and they&#039;ve done everything to support the model,
then how come the Economy has gone to hell in a leadpainted chinese basket?
Because Bush-enomics is merely Reagan-omics in disguise,i/e Bullshit encouraging investment from the middle class to line their silk pockets a.k.a shearing the sheep.
My highschool economics teacher taught us this on the downlow,
and when I brought it up in college the professor shouted me down as if I were reading aloud the mallefus.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++<br />
The idea under which Bushenomics was sold is this:</p>
<p>* The rich are the investor class.<br />
* If the rich have more money, they will invest more.<br />
* Their investments will create more business.<br />
* Those businesses will create more wealth, thus improving everyone’s lives and making the nation stronger. They will also create new and better jobs.</p>
<p>================================================<br />
If the buisness model states the above and they&#8217;ve done everything to support the model,<br />
then how come the Economy has gone to hell in a leadpainted chinese basket?<br />
Because Bush-enomics is merely Reagan-omics in disguise,i/e Bullshit encouraging investment from the middle class to line their silk pockets a.k.a shearing the sheep.<br />
My highschool economics teacher taught us this on the downlow,<br />
and when I brought it up in college the professor shouted me down as if I were reading aloud the mallefus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
