<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Absolute Truth Concerning the Evolution Debate.  -Grimgold</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=450</link>
	<description>The Blog of BartCop.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 04:36:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: greyhawk</title>
		<link>https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=450&#038;cpage=1#comment-4539</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[greyhawk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bartblog.bartcop.com/2007/07/10/the-absolute-truth-concerning-the-evolution-debate-grimgold/#comment-4539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I prefer to think of it as the Flintstones theory of world events.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer to think of it as the Flintstones theory of world events.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hammer187</title>
		<link>https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=450&#038;cpage=1#comment-4534</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hammer187]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bartblog.bartcop.com/2007/07/10/the-absolute-truth-concerning-the-evolution-debate-grimgold/#comment-4534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Absolute Truth&quot;?  I disagree.
You seem to be under the impression that Darwin ever suggested that humans evolved &quot;from&quot; monkeys.  He didn&#039;t, nor does anyone today who is acquainted with Darwin&#039;s work firsthand--so your gorilla example is irrelevant.

You also seem incredulous that a complete set of fossilized examples of every species ever to have existed has not been found, rather than marvelling at the fact that fossilization is a very unlikely process and that it&#039;s a &#039;miracle&#039; that so many fossils *have* been found.

Evolution by natural selection is an observable --and observed--fact, as much a fact as gravitation.  Human &quot;belief&quot; in it is irrelevant. It has nothing whatever to do with either atheism nor religion.  The one neither proves nor disproves, nor conflicts with, the other--except of course for the funamentalists, the literal 6,000-year old earth crowd.  But those types are immune to reason anyway.

Yeah, the &quot;gardener&quot; theory is as plausible as any other.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Absolute Truth&#8221;?  I disagree.<br />
You seem to be under the impression that Darwin ever suggested that humans evolved &#8220;from&#8221; monkeys.  He didn&#8217;t, nor does anyone today who is acquainted with Darwin&#8217;s work firsthand&#8211;so your gorilla example is irrelevant.</p>
<p>You also seem incredulous that a complete set of fossilized examples of every species ever to have existed has not been found, rather than marvelling at the fact that fossilization is a very unlikely process and that it&#8217;s a &#8216;miracle&#8217; that so many fossils *have* been found.</p>
<p>Evolution by natural selection is an observable &#8211;and observed&#8211;fact, as much a fact as gravitation.  Human &#8220;belief&#8221; in it is irrelevant. It has nothing whatever to do with either atheism nor religion.  The one neither proves nor disproves, nor conflicts with, the other&#8211;except of course for the funamentalists, the literal 6,000-year old earth crowd.  But those types are immune to reason anyway.</p>
<p>Yeah, the &#8220;gardener&#8221; theory is as plausible as any other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
