<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE MOST RELIGIOUSEST CHRISTIANITE</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=4952</link>
	<description>The Blog of BartCop.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 04:36:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RS Janes</title>
		<link>https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=4952&#038;cpage=1#comment-29513</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RS Janes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bartblog.bartcop.com/2008/08/16/the-most-religiousest-christianite/#comment-29513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It now appears McNasty was listening to the Obama portion and knew the questions in advance. Apparently CNN&#039;s Rick Sanchez saw McCain in his limo outside the venue when he was supposed to have been caught in traffic, or so his campaign said. Rick Warren has also admitted that he had no way of guaranteeing that McCain wouldn&#039;t cheat and listen.

Here&#039;s a telling exchange:

&lt;em&gt;McCAIN: Could I — are we going to get back to the importance of Supreme Court Justices or should I mention –

WARREN: We will get to that.

McCAIN: OK. All right. OK.

WARREN: You’re jumping ahead…&lt;/em&gt;

&quot;What’s suspicious here is that the topic of the Supreme Court had not come up in McCain’s interview, so it was not a topic to go &#039;back&#039; to. On the other hand, Obama had been asked a question about the Supreme Court during his earlier session, which McCain supposedly had not heard.&quot;
-- Jon Ponder, Pensito Review, Aug. 18, 2008.
http://www.pensitoreview.com/2008/08/18/cheating-at-saddleback-mccain-apparently-knew-court-question-was-coming/

&quot;Mr. Warren, the pastor of Saddleback, had assured the audience while he was interviewing Mr. Obama that &quot;we have safely placed Senator McCain in a cone of silence&quot; and that he could not hear the questions... Interviewed Sunday on CNN, Mr. Warren seemed surprised to learn that Mr. McCain was not in the building during the Obama interview.&quot;
-- Rachel Sklar, Huffington Post, Aug. 18, 2008.
 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/18/nyt-backs-up-nbc-mccain-w_n_119476.html

A caller to Thom Hartmann&#039;s show today also said she followed McCain&#039;s limo and saw him parked outside the building during Obama&#039;s part of the interview. She was rousted out by the police.

Once again, any time you trust a Republican to deal honestly, even to inhabiting a &#039;cone of silence,&#039; you end up wearing a cone of stupidity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It now appears McNasty was listening to the Obama portion and knew the questions in advance. Apparently CNN&#8217;s Rick Sanchez saw McCain in his limo outside the venue when he was supposed to have been caught in traffic, or so his campaign said. Rick Warren has also admitted that he had no way of guaranteeing that McCain wouldn&#8217;t cheat and listen.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a telling exchange:</p>
<p><em>McCAIN: Could I — are we going to get back to the importance of Supreme Court Justices or should I mention –</p>
<p>WARREN: We will get to that.</p>
<p>McCAIN: OK. All right. OK.</p>
<p>WARREN: You’re jumping ahead…</em></p>
<p>&#8220;What’s suspicious here is that the topic of the Supreme Court had not come up in McCain’s interview, so it was not a topic to go &#8216;back&#8217; to. On the other hand, Obama had been asked a question about the Supreme Court during his earlier session, which McCain supposedly had not heard.&#8221;<br />
&#8211; Jon Ponder, Pensito Review, Aug. 18, 2008.<br />
<a href="http://www.pensitoreview.com/2008/08/18/cheating-at-saddleback-mccain-apparently-knew-court-question-was-coming/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pensitoreview.com/2008/08/18/cheating-at-saddleback-mccain-apparently-knew-court-question-was-coming/</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Mr. Warren, the pastor of Saddleback, had assured the audience while he was interviewing Mr. Obama that &#8220;we have safely placed Senator McCain in a cone of silence&#8221; and that he could not hear the questions&#8230; Interviewed Sunday on CNN, Mr. Warren seemed surprised to learn that Mr. McCain was not in the building during the Obama interview.&#8221;<br />
&#8211; Rachel Sklar, Huffington Post, Aug. 18, 2008.<br />
 <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/18/nyt-backs-up-nbc-mccain-w_n_119476.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/18/nyt-backs-up-nbc-mccain-w_n_119476.html</a></p>
<p>A caller to Thom Hartmann&#8217;s show today also said she followed McCain&#8217;s limo and saw him parked outside the building during Obama&#8217;s part of the interview. She was rousted out by the police.</p>
<p>Once again, any time you trust a Republican to deal honestly, even to inhabiting a &#8216;cone of silence,&#8217; you end up wearing a cone of stupidity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kerry</title>
		<link>https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=4952&#038;cpage=1#comment-29481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kerry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 17:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bartblog.bartcop.com/2008/08/16/the-most-religiousest-christianite/#comment-29481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[P.S.  The exception is when there are TV cameras and crews around.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S.  The exception is when there are TV cameras and crews around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kerry</title>
		<link>https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=4952&#038;cpage=1#comment-29480</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kerry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 17:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bartblog.bartcop.com/2008/08/16/the-most-religiousest-christianite/#comment-29480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t I know it!  If you are not a member of their particular money grubbing cult you get no help.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t I know it!  If you are not a member of their particular money grubbing cult you get no help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rainlander</title>
		<link>https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=4952&#038;cpage=1#comment-29473</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rainlander]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 03:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bartblog.bartcop.com/2008/08/16/the-most-religiousest-christianite/#comment-29473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s it!
If churchs run a for profit buisness or charity
or use the pulpit to promote a candidate to political office or seek to promote legislation,
then they are no longer strictly houses of worship and need to be taxed like the buisnesses
they indeed are?
If You think I&#039;m playing here then just go down to the thrift store and buy some new duds then go around to a church,any church and ask for money.
See what You get.
Its all bullshit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s it!<br />
If churchs run a for profit buisness or charity<br />
or use the pulpit to promote a candidate to political office or seek to promote legislation,<br />
then they are no longer strictly houses of worship and need to be taxed like the buisnesses<br />
they indeed are?<br />
If You think I&#8217;m playing here then just go down to the thrift store and buy some new duds then go around to a church,any church and ask for money.<br />
See what You get.<br />
Its all bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
