<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;m having a really, really bad day. Grim</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=776</link>
	<description>The Blog of BartCop.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 04:36:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RexDevious</title>
		<link>https://bartblog.bartcop.com/?p=776&#038;cpage=1#comment-5025</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RexDevious]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 07:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bartblog.bartcop.com/2007/08/24/im-haveing-a-really-really-bad-day-grim/#comment-5025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t believe spam still exists. I wrote a program about 5 years ago that is not based on technology (which spammers can adapt to faster than people who know you). I recently set it up so that anyone can use it. If you want to test it for yourself, send an email to &quot;Me@RandyHamilton.com&quot; and I&#039;ll set you up as an alpha tester One unique thing, is you can see what it *would* do before you give it permission to do anything at all. I&#039;ll have support for gmail address (they use SSL) sometime in the next week. But I already trust it enough to run my business emails through it.

Seriously, spam is beatable. Because the people, companies, and websites you want email from know *something* about you - but spammers only know your email address. That&#039;s what my system is based on.

Send me an email and you&#039;ll see how it works. You&#039;ll never get spam, and you&#039;ll never lose an email. I have those same &quot;e-card&quot; emails sitting in about 7 different email account. Not one of them got through of course. And if you think that virus is bad - check out nimda. One person did a preview on that email when I was the CTO of an investment bank, and it took me a good 17 hours to get it out of our networks.

Spammers will only get better at exploiting email - but they&#039;ll never be good enough to beat a system that looks for some indication that you actually *know* the person you&#039;re emailing. I wrote the thing, and *I* couldn&#039;t get a piece of email in your INBOX against your wishes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe spam still exists. I wrote a program about 5 years ago that is not based on technology (which spammers can adapt to faster than people who know you). I recently set it up so that anyone can use it. If you want to test it for yourself, send an email to &#8220;Me@RandyHamilton.com&#8221; and I&#8217;ll set you up as an alpha tester One unique thing, is you can see what it *would* do before you give it permission to do anything at all. I&#8217;ll have support for gmail address (they use SSL) sometime in the next week. But I already trust it enough to run my business emails through it.</p>
<p>Seriously, spam is beatable. Because the people, companies, and websites you want email from know *something* about you &#8211; but spammers only know your email address. That&#8217;s what my system is based on.</p>
<p>Send me an email and you&#8217;ll see how it works. You&#8217;ll never get spam, and you&#8217;ll never lose an email. I have those same &#8220;e-card&#8221; emails sitting in about 7 different email account. Not one of them got through of course. And if you think that virus is bad &#8211; check out nimda. One person did a preview on that email when I was the CTO of an investment bank, and it took me a good 17 hours to get it out of our networks.</p>
<p>Spammers will only get better at exploiting email &#8211; but they&#8217;ll never be good enough to beat a system that looks for some indication that you actually *know* the person you&#8217;re emailing. I wrote the thing, and *I* couldn&#8217;t get a piece of email in your INBOX against your wishes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
