BartBlog

April 2, 2010

Higher gas prices…again

Filed under: Uncategorized — Greg in cheeseland @ 11:13 pm

Excerpt:
Gas prices at the pump are slowly creeping up wards. A barrel of crude oil traded at a price of $85.31 today, April 2, 2010. Yet the demand for gasoline in the U.S. has dropped in the past two years.

President Obama recently opened up approximately 500,000 square miles of previously protected off-shore areas to oil exploration and drilling, including areas off the coast of Florida, thereby increasing potential supply.

There are no new wars in the middle east, nor have there been any hurricanes in the gulf that would drive oil prices up. Refiners that turn crude into fuel are operating at well-blow capacity.

Surging trade figures in China and a weaker dollar can have an effect in offsetting lower demand and helping drive prices up, but that effect is minimal at worst.

Anyone who believes in free market capitalism and markets regulating themselves through supply and demand should also believe that today’s economic circumstances would be a recipe for lower gas prices. But it is not.

So, what’s driving the price up? The same players that brought the American people $4+ gasoline in 2008: Wall Street speculators.

A report published by the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies puts it this way:

The first layer [of oil price discovery] is based on price assessments produced by oil reporting agencies. These prices are derived from relatively illiquid physical markets which lack transparency and are dominated by a few players. The second layer is the futures market which is more transparent, highly liquid and characterized by a large number of players with diverse expectations. A key issue in need of further analysis is the nature of the relationship between these two layers of price discovery.

In other words, the actual market, determined by supply and demand and based on actual production of gasoline from crude has little to do with how much Americans pay at the pump. An oil contract’s price today has nothing to do with free market concepts. The people who buy and sell oil on their PC screens do…and chances are, you’re not one of them.

A June 2006 US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations report on “The Role of Market Speculation in rising oil and gas prices,” noted, “…there is substantial evidence supporting the conclusion that the large amount of speculation in the current market has significantly increased prices.” The Senate committee staff documented in the report a gaping loophole in U.S. Government regulation of oil derivatives trading so huge an oil tanker could sail through it. That seems precisely what they have been doing in ramping oil prices through the roof in recent years.

The Senate report was ignored in the media and in the Congress.

So, what can be done now?

The CFTC is weighing a proposal to put global limits on how many oil contracts any one market player can buy or sell, and legislation to revamp financial regulation that’s expected to pass Congress this year could force greater disclosure by oil traders to regulators.

Any regulation of big business, however, is perceived by the corporate media and the people that believe anything they see on TV or read in the paper as socialism or fascism, or whatever the talking heads tell them to think. There may be tea parties against regulating speculators, while the people that attend them pay more at the pump to attend them.

For the rest of us in America, there will be no imminent relief at the gas pump. Thanks to Wall Street, plan on spending more at the gas pump this summer.

Read more here: http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-38220-Orlando-Independent-Examiner~y2010m4d2-Why-is-price-of-gasoline-rising-while-demand-in-US-is-down

March 31, 2010

Are state-owned banks an answer to economic woes?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Greg in cheeseland @ 8:15 pm

Excerpt:
The state of North Dakota has the lowest unemployment rate in the nation at 4.1% and is one of only two states expected to meet their budgets in 2010. It also has the nation’s only state-owned bank. Several economists and officials from state governments across the nation are beginning to think that there is a correlation.

North Dakota is a sparsely populated state of less than 700,000 people, largely located in cold and isolated farming communities. Yet, since 2000, the state’s GNP has grown 56 percent, personal income has grown 43 percent and wages have grown 34 percent. The state not only has no funding problems, but in 2009 it had a budget surplus of $1.3 billion, the largest it has ever had.

According to the AP, the bank had almost $4 billion in assets and a $2.67 billion loan portfolio at the end of last year, according to its most recent quarterly financial report. It made $58.1 million in profits in 2009, setting a record for the sixth straight year. During the last decade, the bank funneled almost $300 million in profits to North Dakota’s treasury.

According to attorney, economist and author Ellen Hodgson Brown writing for truthout.org, North Dakota’s recipe for success may be that “it has its own credit machine. North Dakota is the only state in the Union to own its own bank.” Brown’s latest of 11 books, “Web of Debt,” is an analysis of the Federal Reserve and “the money trust.” She shows how this private cartel has usurped the power to create money from the people themselves, and how we the people can get it back.

All chartered banks have the ability to create credit on their books simply with accounting entries, using the magic of “fractional reserve” lending. According to Brown, however, state-owned banks have distinct advantages over their privately-owned competitors, both for the state and consumers, and for the bank:

…Private banks are limited by bank capital requirements and by their for-profit business models. And that is where a state-owned bank has enormous advantages: States own huge amounts of capital, and they can think farther ahead that their quarterly profit statements, allowing them to take long-term risks. Their asset bases are not marred by oversized salaries and bonuses; they have no shareholders expecting a sizable cut, and they have not marred their books with bad derivatives bets, unmarketable collateralized debt obligations and mark-to-market accounting problems.

Furthermore, because the BND is set up as a dba, that is the state of North Dakota doing business as the BND, that makes the capital of the state the capital of the bank. By law, the state and all its agencies must deposit their funds in the bank, which pays a competitive interest rate to the state treasurer. The bank also accepts deposits from other entities. These copious deposits can then be plowed back into the state in the form of low-interest loans to farmers, students and small businesses. The bank pays no federal or state taxes, but instead pays a dividend to the state in that all profits are returned to the treasury, thereby offsetting taxes.

Read more here: http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-38220-Orlando-Independent-Examiner~y2010m3d31-Are-stateowned-banks-an-answer-to-economic-woes

Why again?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Peregrin @ 4:18 am

Jesus and Mo

March 28, 2010

PATRIOT Act may be used against tea party

Filed under: Uncategorized — Greg in cheeseland @ 1:17 am

Excerpt:
According to Douglas J. Hagmann, writing for Northeast Intelligence Network, a “federal intelligence source” revealed that “high-level discussions between top lawmakers and agency heads are ‘exploring the application of the Patriot Act against any right-wing individual or group that poses a danger to government operations.’”

Whether or not Congress people were subjected to taunting and racial slurs, bricks or bullets penetrating their office windows, or having a sibling’s gas line cut is not the issue I wish to examine here. The issue is poetic justice.

While any anonymous “source” quoted in media should be taken with a grain of salt, I hope this one is credible because the tea partiers deserve the same treatment that true libertarians and progressives were subjected to during the eight years of the Bush administration. Remember when people were arrested for wearing objectionable tee shirts, or removed for having anti-war bumper stickers in the parking lot at Bush rallies? Remember when crowds were herded into free speech zones behind chain link fences and barbed wire? Now it is your turn to experience oppression, right-wingers, conservatives, Republicans, tea baggers, or whatever you want to call yourselves.

Where were the tea partiers when the Bush administration was shredding our constitution? Where were they when Bush was spending billions on unnecessary wars? Where were they when Bush was running up a deficit by giving tax breaks to corporations that ship jobs overseas? Where were they when Bush was mortgaging our future to China? Where were they when Bush was creating a torture state to deal with a fake war on terror?

A lot of the tea baggers were probably cheer-leading the entire mess on. They were the ones calling anti-war activists “terrorist sympathizers.” They were calling 911 truthers “conspiracy freaks.” They were calling anyone who questioned Bush’s tax breaks to corporations and the ultra-rich “communists.” And they would not get their butts off the couch, turn off Fox News and do anything to stop the Bush administration from moving the U.S. a few steps closer to a corporate fascist state.

While Obama continues many of the same policies of his predecessors and is by no means a true progressive or even a liberal, one difference between Obama and Bush is that Obama is throwing a few bones to middle class consumers in America by trying reign in some of the worst corporate abuses. The other difference is far more obvious – there’s a black man in the white house!

Have fun in the America you helped create. Enjoy the McCain-Lieberman Police State Act (S. 3081: Enemy Belligerent, Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010). Hopefully the government will lock up all of the racists, hypocrites and arm chair warriors that are part of the tea party movement the minute they step out of line.

You’ve earned it. Happy tea-partying!

Read more here: http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-38220-Orlando-Independent-Examiner~y2010m3d28-PATRIOT-Act-may-be-used-against-tea-party

There are few fresh photos from moronswithsigns.blogspot.com in the above article!

March 27, 2010

Botched raid in Afghanistan covered up by NATO

Filed under: Uncategorized — Greg in cheeseland @ 9:46 am

Excerpt:
In the predawn hours of Friday, February 12, two pregnant women, a teenage girl and two local officials were shot to death in their home in Afghanistan.

The first person to die in the assault was Commander Dawood, 43, a long-serving, popular and highly-trained policeman who had recently been promoted to head of intelligence in one of Paktia’s most volatile districts. His brother, Saranwal Zahir, was a prosecutor in Ahmadabad district. He was killed while he stood in a doorway trying to protest their innocence.

Three women crouching in a hallway behind him were hit by the same volley of fire. Bibi Shirin, 22, had four children under the age of 5. Bibi Saleha, 37, had 11 children. Both of them, according to their relatives, were pregnant. They were killed instantly.

According to journalist Jerome Starkey, writing for The Times UK, at first no one claimed responsibility for the killings. A US official in Kabul refused to identify the force involved, citing “utmost national and strategic security interests”.

Starkey’s reporting forcefully rebutted this claim. Instead of simply retracting their story, however, NATO went so far as to attempt to damage Starkey’s credibility by telling other Kabul-based journalists that they had proof he’d misquoted ISAF spokesman Rear Adm. Greg Smith in an interview. When Starkey demanded a copy of the recording, NATO initially ignored him and eventually admitted that no recording existed.

Local elders delivered $2,000 in compensation from the occupying authorities for each of the five victims to the head of the family, Haji Sharabuddin, after protests brought Gardez, the capital of Paktia, to a halt. He refused the money, responding “I don’t want money. I want justice. All our family, we now don’t care about our lives. We will all do suicide attacks and [the whole province] will support us.”

Regardless of the details, it is probably not a good idea to fight a “war on terror” by terrorizing the population and giving locals an incentive to do suicide attacks. Nice job, NATO – if the goal in Afghanistan is perpetual war.

For more details on this incident, please check out this video produced by Rethink Afghanistan: http://rethinkafghanistan.com/blog/?p=1844

Read more here: http://www.examiner.com/x-38220-Orlando-Independent-Examiner~y2010m3d27-Botched-raid-in-Afghanistan-covered-up-by-NATO

March 26, 2010

Filed under: Uncategorized — Peregrin @ 10:33 am

Death and Disease

GOP plans to obstruct Senate legislation (so, what’s new?)

Filed under: Uncategorized — Greg in cheeseland @ 3:10 am

Excerpt:
After losing the battle against health care reform, Republican Senate leaders, like impetuous, spoiled brats who take away the ball after losing the ball game, have publicly stated that they intend to use childish parliamentary tricks to bring legislative procedures in the Senate to a halt.

On Wednesday that became apparent to Col. Ann Wright (U.S. Army – Ret.) when she travelled to Washington to attend hearings, as well as other veterans and senior military officers, some of whom had traveled from as far away as Hawaii and Korea for the Armed Services committee hearing.

Col. Wright, writing for CommonDreams.org, expresses her shock and outrage:

I was attending a U.S. Senate Veterans Committee hearing on homeless vets when at 11am, Committee chair Senator Akaka abruptly said that the hearing must end immediately as one member of the “minority” party had invoked a parliamentary prerogative to suspend the day’s hearings. I was amazed and upset that the important hearing on homeless veterans could be so easily ended. I stood up in the hearing and said I was a veteran and that I was outraged that one disgruntled Senator could halt the hearings of the Senate.

Senate Republicans are also blocking the passage of two bills that would affirm the separation of TRICARE, the military’s health program, from the newly passed Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

Senator Jim Webb (D-VA) stated on the Senate floor, “Let the American people understand the Republicans objected to a matter that could have fixed by law tomorrow.”

Hearings regarding veterans affairs and Afghanistan are not all that GOP senators plan to obstruct. It appears Coburn is positioning himself to be the lead obstructionist.

According to Manu Raju writing for POLITICO, Tom Coburn plans to filibuster a 30-day extension of a bill that extends a series of emergency programs, like funding for unemployment insurance benefits and COBRA health coverage for the jobless. It would keep federal dollars flowing to highway projects, extend flood insurance programs and stave off a deep cut in reimbursement rates for doctors who serve Medicare patients. Senator Jim Bunning (R-KY) gained notoriety, even among some members of his own party, for doing that last month and Republicans have repeatedly attacked this bill.

Independents generally have a distaste for partisan politics of this nature. If one sides with the American people, however, it is difficult to side with Republicans when they shut down Senate proceedings regarding issues that affect our troops deployed overseas, veterans and Americans struggling in the worst job market since the Great Depression.

It is easy to see why the GOP is becoming known as “the party of No.” The only consolation is that it will be hard to tell the difference with the GOP’s “new” strategy, however, since Republicans have not cooperated on any issue since the Obama administration took office.

Read more here: http://www.examiner.com/x-38220-Orlando-Independent-Examiner~y2010m3d26-GOP-plans-to-obstruct-Senate-legislation-after-health-care-reform-bill-passes

March 24, 2010

“Fair and Balanced”

Filed under: Uncategorized — Peregrin @ 4:58 am

Video

March 23, 2010

The real vulture that is Eric Massa

Filed under: Uncategorized — Greg in cheeseland @ 7:29 pm

Excerpt:
Rep. Eric Massa’s resignation created a week-long media buzz earlier this month amid allegations of a homosexual harassment scandal. ABC news asked on their web site, “should we be digging deeper?” Yes, you should, U.S. corporate media.

Instead of covering tabloid-like sex scandals 24/7, or trying to frame Massa’s resignation in the context of the health care reform debate, perhaps a real look at Massa’s ulterior motives for resigning are in order.

Today, investigative reporter Greg Palast published an article that does just that. Palast, however, like a real journalist, digs beyond the bovine excrement and superficial sound bytes that make up today’s television news, or the newspapers that are most useful for catching your pet’s droppings:

At first, [Massa] said he was quitting Congress because he has cancer. Then he said he resigned because a buck-naked Rahm Emanuel bullied him in the Congressional shower-room and then threatened him over his health care vote. (Foxhole wing-nut Glenn Beck fell for that canard.) Then Massa said he resigned because of an aide’s accusation that the Congressman tickled the aide in an “inappropriate” manner. (The mainstream press swallowed that one whole.)

The public persona of Eric Massa portrayed by the corporate media drew of a picture of a liberal progressive, but his private persona (aside from the tickling and snorkeling) paints a picture of yet another politician bought and sold by corporate interests, whose past finally caught him by the tail.

A “vulture fund” is a fund or investment company that purchases debt claims as a secondary lender. This means that vulture funds are not primary lenders, but rather are entities that have purchased the debt from some other source, such as a bank. Generally, these funds purchase debt involving highly distressed countries, such as Liberia or Argentina.

In the mid-1990s, Paul Singer invented vulture funds. Companies that practice this sort of predatory capitalism buy debts racked up years ago by the poorest countries on earth, almost always when they were run by kleptocratic dictators backed by the CIA, before most of the current population was born. They buy it for small sums, as little as 10 percent of its paper value, from the original holder.

The sellers of these debts usually are more than willing to rid themselves of these debts because many of these debts may soon come into default or face restructuring negotiations. Since the vulture funds purchase this debt as it is about to be written off, banks will write off loans as a loss if they believe that the borrower will no longer be able to repay the loans.

But back to former Rep. Eric Massa – how does he fit into all of this? Progressives and liberals like to claim that Republicans in congress are for sale. That may be true, but it may also be true that Democrats like Eric Massa are for rent, and when their leases expire they move on to another venue.

According to Palast:

The vultures had been looking for some morally challenged congressperson to front a bill to help them crank billions from the budgets of Third World nations. The law that could make demi-billionaire Singer a billionaire is called, “The Judgment Evading Foreign States Accountability Act” (H.R. 2493). In effect, the bill says that if Argentina (and other Third World nations) don’t pay Mr. Singer and his vulture buddies the billions they demand, then the US government will act as Singer’s enforcement arm, hanging out Argentina to dry, cutting off trade between our countries.

Palast also claims that two sources said, “Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was not amused at Massa’s weirdo attack on the financial lifeblood of US allies, nor does the White House favor a law which would provoke seizures of US assets abroad.”

It is unclear why Rep. Massa resigned, but if it was because he is a homosexual and tickled a staffer, or because he did not like the health care bill – then no problem.

Senator David Vitter (R-LA), known as “Vitter The __itter,” was caught getting diapered by the Washington Madame, and still remains in the Senate voting against what he calls Obama’s “immoral” program. And in case conservatives and Republicans think this is soley a democratic scandal, you may want to know that Rudy Giuliani’s campaign was primarily funded by money from organizations involved in these same vulture funds.

If Massa resigned, however, because of his connections with the players that work vulture funds and because that contradicts his TV image as a progressive. Or because the executive branch put some heat behind his tail due to his hypocrisy, then it makes more sense.

Read more here: http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-38220-Orlando-Independent-Examiner~y2010m3d23-Eric-Massa-and-vulture-funds-The-real-scandal
P.S. – Even though I’m in Orlando, I’m still a cheesehead!

March 21, 2010

Today’s nuclear wars

Filed under: Uncategorized — Greg in cheeseland @ 7:48 pm

This is a rehash of an article I did last October. I updated and reposted it on my site because I think it is an issue that should keep getting publicity, yet is seldom, if ever, mentioned in the mainstream media. The use of DU should be reason enough for everyone to want to end the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Excerpt:
In 1945, the first nuclear weapons were unleashed on civilians. In 1991 the first nuclear war was fought in Iraq. The second was fought in Serbia in 1999. The third and fourth are still being waged in Afghanistan and Iraq, thanks to our tax dollars, the callousness of the U.S. government and complacency in our media.

You will not like what you see in these photos, but get used to it. People in Afghanistan and Iraq will be seeing things like this for the next 4.5 billion years, because that is the half-life of depleted uranium (DU).

While the Pentagon has continued to claim, against all scientific evidence, that there is no hazard posed by DU, US troops in Iraq have reportedly been instructed to avoid any sites where these weapons have been used. They are instructed to wear masks if they have to approach destroyed Iraqi tanks, exploded bunkers, etc.

DU is the Trojan Horse of nuclear war – it keeps giving and keeps killing. There is no way to clean it up, and no way to turn it off because it continues to decay into other radioactive isotopes in over 20 steps. While the U.S. and British governments claim that DU is a conventional weapon, the truth is that it meets the definition of a weapon of mass destruction in two out of three categories under the U.S. Federal Code, Title 50 Chapter 40 Section 2302.

Most Americans know little or nothing about DU and its devastating effect on human life. It’s about time you do. The use of DU munitions is yet another reason to end these wars that are destroying not only lives in Iraq, Afghanistan and the ranks of our military, but also the credibility of our nation in the eyes of the world community.

Read more here:
http://www.examiner.com/x-38220-Orlando-Independent-Examiner~y2010m3d21-The-nuclear-wars-few-talk-about-Depleted-uranium

March 20, 2010

Addicted to Nonsense

Filed under: Uncategorized — Greg in cheeseland @ 11:56 pm

I normally post my writing on the blog. I am going to make an exception here because I think this is well-worth reading. It was written by Chris Hedges, who spent years overseas as a “real” journalist. I think it’s well-worth your time to read:

Addicted to Nonsense
By Chris Hedges

Will Tiger Woods finally talk to the police? Who will replace Oprah? (Not that Oprah can ever be replaced, of course.) And will Michaele and Tareq Salahi, the couple who crashed President Barack Obama’s first state dinner, command the hundreds of thousands of dollars they want for an exclusive television interview? Can Levi Johnston, father of former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s grandson, get his wish to be a contestant on “Dancing With the Stars”?

The chatter that passes for news, the gossip that is peddled by the windbags on the airwaves, the noise that drowns out rational discourse, and the timidity and cowardice of what is left of the newspaper industry reflect our flight into collective insanity. We stand on the cusp of one of the most seismic and disturbing dislocations in human history, one that is radically reconfiguring our economy as it is the environment, and our obsessions revolve around the trivial and the absurd.

What really matters in our lives—the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the steady deterioration of the dollar, the mounting foreclosures, the climbing unemployment, the melting of the polar ice caps and the awful reality that once the billions in stimulus money run out next year we will be bereft and broke—doesn’t fit into the cheerful happy talk that we mainline into our brains. We are enraptured by the revels of a dying civilization. Once reality shatters the airy edifice, we will scream and yell like petulant children to be rescued, saved and restored to comfort and complacency. There will be no shortage of demagogues, including buffoons like Sarah Palin, who will oblige. We will either wake up to face our stark new limitations, to retreat from imperial projects and discover a new simplicity, as well as a new humility, or we will stumble blindly toward catastrophe and neofeudalism.

Celebrity worship has banished the real from public discourse. And the adulation of celebrity is pervasive. The frenzy around political messiahs, or the devotion of millions of viewers to Oprah, is all part of the yearning to see ourselves in those we worship. We seek to be like them. We seek to make them like us. If Jesus and “The Purpose Driven Life” won’t make us a celebrity, then Tony Robbins or positive psychologists or reality television will. We are waiting for our cue to walk onstage and be admired and envied, to become known and celebrated. Nothing else in life counts.

We yearn to stand before the camera, to be noticed and admired. We build pages on social networking sites devoted to presenting our image to the world. We seek to control how others think of us. We define our worth solely by our visibility. We live in a world where not to be seen, in some sense, is to not exist. We pay lifestyle advisers to help us look and feel like celebrities, to build around us the set for the movie of our own life. Martha Stewart constructed her financial empire, when she wasn’t engaged in insider trading, telling women how to create a set design for the perfect home. The realities within the home, the actual family relationships, are never addressed. Appearances make everything whole. Plastic surgeons, fitness gurus, diet doctors, therapists, life coaches, interior designers and fashion consultants all, in essence, promise to make us happy, to make us celebrities. And happiness comes, we are assured, with how we look, with the acquisition of wealth and power, or at least the appearance of it. Glossy magazines like Town & Country cater to the absurd pretensions of the very rich to be celebrities. They are photographed in expensive designer clothing inside the lavishly decorated set pieces that are their homes. The route to happiness is bound up in how skillfully we present ourselves to the world. We not only have to conform to the dictates of this manufactured vision, but we also have to project an unrelenting optimism and happiness. Hedonism and wealth are openly worshiped on Wall Street as well as on shows such as “The Hills,” “Gossip Girl,” “Sex and the City,” “My Super Sweet 16” and “The Real Housewives of (whatever bourgeois burg happens to be in vogue).”

The American oligarchy—1 percent of whom control more wealth than the bottom 90 percent combined—are the characters we most envy and watch on television. They live and play in multimillion-dollar mansions. They marry models or professional athletes. They are chauffeured in stretch limos. They rush from fashion shows to movie premieres to fabulous resorts. They have surgically enhanced, perfect bodies and are draped in designer clothes that cost more than some people make in a year. This glittering life is held before us like a beacon. This life, we are told, is the most desirable, the most gratifying. And this is the life we want. Greed is good, we believe, because one day through our acquisitions we will become the elite. So let the rest of the bastards suffer.

The working class, comprising tens of millions of struggling Americans, are locked out of television’s gated community. They are mocked, even as they are tantalized, by the lives of excess they watch on the screen in their living rooms. Almost none of us will ever attain these lives of wealth and power. Yet we are told that if we want it badly enough, if we believe sufficiently in ourselves, we too can have everything. We are left, when we cannot adopt these impossible lifestyles as our own, with feelings of inferiority and worthlessness. We have failed where others have succeeded.

We consume these countless lies daily. We believe the false promises that if we spend more money, if we buy this brand or that product, if we vote for this candidate, we will be respected, envied, powerful, loved and protected. The flamboyant lives of celebrities and the outrageous characters on television, movies, professional wrestling and sensational talk shows are peddled to us, promising to fill up the emptiness in our own lives. Celebrity culture encourages everyone to think of themselves as potential celebrities, as possessing unique if unacknowledged gifts. Faith in ourselves, in a world of make-believe, is more important than reality. Reality, in fact, is dismissed and shunned as an impediment to success, a form of negativity. The New Age mysticism and pop psychology of television personalities and evangelical pastors, along with the array of self-help best-sellers penned by motivational speakers, psychiatrists and business tycoons, peddle this fantasy. Reality is condemned in these popular belief systems as the work of Satan, as defeatist, as negativity or as inhibiting our inner essence and power. Those who question, those who doubt, those who are critical, those who are able to confront reality, along with those who grasp the hollowness and danger of celebrity culture, are condemned for their pessimism or intellectualism.

The illusionists who shape our culture, and who profit from our incredulity, hold up the gilded cult of Us. Popular expressions of religious belief, personal empowerment, corporatism, political participation and self-definition argue that all of us are special, entitled and unique. All of us, by tapping into our inner reserves of personal will and undiscovered talent, by visualizing what we want, can achieve, and deserve to achieve, happiness, fame and success. This relentless message cuts across ideological lines. This mantra has seeped into every aspect of our lives. We are all entitled to everything. And because of this self-absorption, and deep self-delusion, we have become a country of child-like adults who speak and think in the inane gibberish of popular culture.

Celebrities who come from humble backgrounds are held up as proof that anyone can be adored by the world. These celebrities, like saints, are examples that the impossible is always possible. Our fantasies of belonging, of fame, of success and of fulfillment are projected onto celebrities. These fantasies are stoked by the legions of those who amplify the culture of illusion, who persuade us that the shadows are real. The juxtaposition of the impossible illusions inspired by celebrity culture and our “insignificant” individual achievements, however, is leading to an explosive frustration, anger, insecurity and invalidation. It is fostering a self-perpetuating cycle that drives the frustrated, alienated individual with even greater desperation and hunger away from reality, back toward the empty promises of those who seduce us, who tell us what we want to hear. The worse things get, the more we beg for fantasy. We ingest these lies until our faith and our money run out. And when we fall into despair we medicate ourselves, as if the happiness we have failed to find in the hollow game is our deficiency. And, of course, we are told it is.

I spent two years traveling the country to write a book on the Christian right called “American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America.” I visited former manufacturing towns where for many the end of the world is no longer an abstraction. Many have lost hope. Fear and instability have plunged the working class into profound personal and economic despair, and, not surprisingly, into the arms of demagogues and charlatans of the radical Christian right who offer a belief in magic, miracles and the fiction of a utopian Christian nation. Unless we rapidly re-enfranchise these dispossessed workers, insert them back into the economy, unless we give them hope, these demagogues will rise up to take power. Time is running out. The poor can dine out only so long on illusions. Once they grasp that they have been betrayed, once they match the bleak reality of their future with the fantasies they are fed, once their homes are foreclosed and they realize that the jobs they lost are never coming back, they will react with a fury and vengeance that will snuff out the remains of our anemic democracy and usher in a new dark age.

By Chris Hedges, who is a senior fellow at The Nation Institute and who writes a weekly column for Truthdig that appears on Mondays. He is the author of “Empire of Illusion: The End of Literacy and the Triumph of Spectacle.”

link: http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/addicted_to_nonsense_20091129/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Truthdig+Truthdig%3A+Drilling+Beneath+the+Headlines&utm_content=Google+Reader

Teabag Rally

Filed under: Uncategorized — Peregrin @ 8:26 pm

teabagrally

Saw this on Facebook. The owner said:

Think the Tea Party isn’t racist? Protesters at today’s last-ditch anti health car reform rally spat on Rep. Emmanuel Cleaver and shouted “Nigger” at civil rights hero John Lewis. Oh, and check out the sign. How sick is that? Is this really the American anyone wants? These people are a fucking disgrace to humanity.

Okay, so this is where it came from.  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/20/tea-party-protests-nier-f_n_507116.html

March 19, 2010

Sean Hannity punked out by a right-wing blogger

Filed under: Uncategorized — Greg in cheeseland @ 9:13 pm
Excerpt:
Conservative pundits like FOX New’s Sean Hannity can expect to take some flack from writers on the left. But when a “fellow” conservative writer calls his charity “a huge scam,” it may be time to take a closer look.
Sean Hannity has been traveling the country on his so-called “freedom concert” tour for years. These shows are promoted as benefit concerts by an organization known as Freedom Alliance to raise money to send the children of servicemen who died in Iraq to college. The organization proudly touts convicted con artist, Oliver North, as one of its co-founders.
According to conservative blogger Debbie Schlussel, less than 4 to 7 percent of the money donated to Hannity’s Freedom Alliance “charity” in the past two years actually went to the causes for which donations were solicited.
Hannity’s Freedom Alliance is supposedly “raising money to pay for the college tuition of the children of fallen soldiers and to pay severely wounded war vets.” According to recent reports, the truth is that millions of the money donated was spent to “ferret the Hannity posse of family and friends [about the country] in high style.”
In other words, Sean Hannity is using the wounded American heroes he claims to champion as tools to enrich himself and surround himself in luxury. Most of the money goes to pay for luxury jets and fleets of limousines for Hannity and his entourage, as well as other administrative costs that far exceed the usual ratio of costs to charitable outlays for legitimate charities.
Regardless of whether or not Schlussel’s assessment of Hannity’s charity is correct, it is always advisable to take a close look at any organization soliciting for donations before making a contribution. You have a right to know whether your money is spent helping the cause you donated to, or lining the pockets of millionaire punks like Sean Hannity.

March 17, 2010

The latest 9/11 document drop, thanks to the ACLU

Filed under: Uncategorized — Greg in cheeseland @ 9:22 pm

I know that “bart” is not into the topic of 9/11, but I continue to do research on the subject. I feel it is important because the attacks on 9/11 were the catalyst that enabled corporatist fascists in the U.S. to further their agenda. I may be naive, but I still think that if the lies their policies were based on are exposed, the American people may wake up and stand up against the corporations that own their government and are taking over the country. Exposing the lies about 9/11 may be the key to stopping the U.S. from becoming a corporate fascist state…Of course I could be wrong.

ACLU obtains document stating 9/11 commission told to “not cross the line”

Excerpt:
According to a document obtained by the ACLU under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) on Tuesday March 16, the 9/11 commission was warned on Jan. 6th, 2004 by high-level administration officials to “not cross the line” in the investigation of the events that occurred on Sept. 11, 2001.

The high-level administration officials included Attorney General John Ashcroft, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and CIA Director George J. Tenet. The ACLU described it as a fax sent by David Addington, then-counsel to former vice president Dick Cheney.

The warning in the memo released by the government to the ACLU is just one example of how the Bush administration fiercely struggled to prevent the 9/11 Commission from conducting a deeper probe into the attacks. It is common knowledge that Bush and Cheney refused to cooperate with the investigation and when forced to do so, only testified together, not under oath.

What may not be known to many Americans is that members of the 9/11 Commission have publicly stated that the investigation was a whitewash, and stymied from the beginning.

John Farmer, the senoir counsel to the 9/11 Comission, said that the government agreed not to tell the truth about 9/11, echoing the assertions of fellow 9/11 Commission members who concluded that the Pentagon was engaged in deliberate deception about their response to the attack.

Senator Max Cleland, who resigned from the 9/11 Commission after calling it a “national scandal”, stated in a 2003 PBS interview:

I’m saying that’s deliberate. I am saying that the delay in relating this information to the American public out of a hearing… series of hearings, that several members of Congress knew eight or ten months ago, including Bob Graham and others, that was deliberately slow walked… the 9/11 Commission was deliberately slow walked, because the Administration’s policy was, and its priority was, we’re gonna take Saddam Hussein out.

On Democracy Now, Cleland also said, “One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up”.

While most of the above statements are hearsay and impossible to verify factually, the document that the ACLU has obtained collaberates what officials involved in the 9/11 Commission have been saying for years. The entire “investigation” was nothing more than a whitewash designed to hide the facts about 9/11 from the American people.

Read more here: http://www.examiner.com/x-38220-Orlando-Independent-Examiner~y2010m3d17-ACLU-obtains-document-stating-911-commission-told-to-not-cross-the-line

Lot’s of links in the above article!

March 11, 2010

Explains a lot

Filed under: Uncategorized — Peregrin @ 2:16 am

pranks

March 5, 2010

Health insurance rate increases imminent with or without reform bill

Filed under: Uncategorized — Greg in cheeseland @ 11:42 pm

Excerpt:
Last month Anthem Blue Cross, a subsidiary of WellPoint, got national media attention and the attention of congress by announcing a 39% rate increase in health care premiums in California. According to Steve Lewis, employed at the world’s third largest health care insurance brokerage, employers and individuals across the nation can expect similar rate increases in the near future, regardless of whether or not health care reform is passed in congress.

In a conference call organized by Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research, Steve Lewis, a highly regarded broker at Willis, painted a picture of the health insurance market in which many employers and individuals seem likely to be priced out of coverage. Noting that “price competition” between insurers was “down from a year ago,” Lewis relayed that “incumbent carriers seem more willing than ever to walk away from existing business.” Insurers are able to do this in part because the markets in which they operate have no adequate competition, suggests Lewis.

According to Sam Stein, writing for the Huffington Post, “The phenomenon of insurers pricing their policies beyond where consumers can afford it seems to be already taking place.” That is reflected in a transcript of a conference call within Aetna last October explicitly revealing plans by their executives to “price-out” over 600,000 Americans from health care coverage.

Meanwhile, President Obama spent the afternoon in back-to-back private sessions with two separate groups of legislators that are uncomfortable with the bill because it lacks a public option that could compete in the free market with private insurance companies and drives insurance down. A non-profit government plan would operate solely off its members’ premiums. His response to them was that a public option would never pass the Senate, but said he would be “personally committed” to pursuing it once the current bill became law, said Representative Raúl Grijalva to the New York Times, Democrat of Arizona and co-chairman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

No matter where one stands politically on the health care reform issue, the economic implications should be a no-brainer. Anyone who understands the concept of a free market should also understand that costs are kept down by competition. Anyone who understands how insurance works should also understand that the more clients a provider has, the less that each individual enrollee in the plan will have to pay in.

A health care reform bill without a public option will do little to curb rate increases. No reform bill will do nothing at all.

Read more here: http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-38220-Orlando-Independent-Examiner~y2010m3d5-Health-insurance-rate-increases-imminent-with-or-without-reform-bill

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress