BartBlog

November 27, 2008

American Cultural Imperialism

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — Bob Patterson @ 7:40 pm

(Fremantle W. A.) November 28, 2008 Stella, from Great Britain, was disconcerted (and a bit intimidated) when she arrived in Australia and folks took to shouting (or pretending to yell) her name. Someone finally explained to her that they were imitating Marlon Brando in the movie “Streetcar Named Desire.”The anecdote points out an unusual paradox that might surprise many Americans: American cultural references are much more prevalent (and understood) by Australians than by Brits.

The concept of “American Cultural Imperialism” was first discovered by this columnist in an exchange of e-mails with an Australian writer, a few years back.

After becoming familiar with the concept, the idea seemed plausible. A visit to Australia is much more convincing. At times Australia today seems like a journey back to California about 40 years ago.

The fact that Australia is (culturally speaking) much more of a “farm club” for American entertainment endeavors than Great Britain has a double significance. People who think that Hollywood stars are world famous, have a nasty shock awaiting them when a Brit asks “Who is Paul Newman?” and the people who ignore the America-Australia connection are snubbing one of the U. S.’s greatest potential markets.

A lawyer in Western Australia told this columnist that it is becoming more and more difficult for him to distinguish between visits to the USA and travels in his home state in Australia because more and more business franchises in this Australian state are familiar names for all American visitors. Parts of the Perth area seem more like New Jersey than cities in a part of the world with Indian Ocean beaches.

If this columnist’s perception is accurate, it means that Hollyweird (American slang for Hollywood) has two challenges: they have to work harder to convince people in Great Britain that “Streetcar Named Desire” was an “all time great”movie and, at the same time, that they are not purposely ignoring the large growing market for American goods and entertainment in this country south of the equator.

It seems logical to this American columnist to assume that Hollywood would have a much greater impact on Great Britain than Australia. Stella’s plight proves that the exact opposite is true. Many more Australians seem to be able to make the Stella-Marlin Brando connection than the folks from London can. Does this mean that Londoners are not as “hip” as Americans assume or does it mean that Australians are a much more likely to understand American cultural references? Wouldn’t you think that the Australians would be much more likely to have interchangeable cultural references with the Brits?

TV in Australia is chock full of local programs and American reruns. How did the Americans shut the Brits out of this built-in-in market for entertainment?

Australians who have some resentment concerning Hollywood’s attitude toward talented Australian film makers seem to assume that it is precisely because they are Australian that they are being shunned. A possible explanation (we don’t have the time or the fact checking facilities of the Santa Monica Public Library at our disposal ) might be that Hollywood resents talented outsiders, even those who are American, and make it difficult for outsiders to break into the “In Crowd.”

During President Bush’s lame duck period, additional criticism of the Texan seems too late to matter, and harsh assessments of President Obama would be unfairly premature, so this columnist’s response will be to devote attention to pop culture topics and hope that this web site’s management will let some extraneous topics slide until more relevant political commentary becomes appropriate.  (We will try to get the spacing done correctly as we learn to do these interim posts.)

Should American web sites send a corresponded to Australia just to get a better perspective for reviews of “Australia”?

Another famous line from “Streetcar Named Desire” was: “Whoever you are, I have always depended on the kindness of strangers.”

Now, the disk jockey will play Stella Soleil’s song “Kiss Kiss” and we will bid you adieu. Have a “what are you rebelling against?” type week.

November 25, 2008

Great Expectations

Filed under: Uncategorized — Peregrin @ 12:52 pm

miracle.jpg

What Would Jesus Buy?

Filed under: Uncategorized — alex @ 12:51 pm

Just in time for Black Friday, “What Would Jesus Buy?” is a documentary film about Reverend Billy and Church of Stop Shopping’s battle against commercial Christmas and the coming shopocalypse. WWJB was produced by Morgan Spurlock, the film-maker responsible for “Supersize Me” and “Where in the World is Osama Bin Laden?”

Click here to watch What Would Jesus Buy?

November 24, 2008

Lame and Getting There

Filed under: Uncategorized — Peregrin @ 5:04 am

ow.jpg

(more…)

November 21, 2008

Filed under: Uncategorized — Bart @ 4:17 pm

bush lib

Credit Crisis=Iraq, Paulson=Cheney, Goldman Sachs=Halliburton

Filed under: Uncategorized — alex @ 4:17 pm

from www.breadwithcircus.com

As the Credit Crisis morphs into the second great depression, there’s a big picture concept that a lot of people seem to be missing. I want to make a very simple point.

The Bush administration’s financial policy is exactly the same as its military policy. The people in Bush’s cabinet who are responsible for any given area are the people that used to be in charge of an industry leader in that area. The revolving door between big business and government is the same with bankers as it is with military contractors. The people in Bush’s cabinet represent the companies that they used to be in charge of, not the American people. They do what is best for their former companies, not for the country.

People have no problem understanding the connection between Dick Cheney and Halliburton in relation to the Iraq war. Cheney used his position of authority to funnel massive amounts of government money to the company that he was once the CEO of. The same thing is happening now with Henry Paulson in relation to Goldman Sachs, the company that he used to be the CEO of. Paulson, like Cheney, came through the revolving door between government and big business. Cheney became Vice President, Paulson became Secretary of the Treasury. Guess which company is benefitting most from the bailout? The man that Paulson appointed to administer the bailout program is Neel Kashkari. Guess who Kashkari used to work for?

In essence, the US Treasury has been privatized and its management has been handed to Goldman Sachs. Forgive the primitive graphics skills and allow me say this a little more clearly.

Goldman Sachs

I’ll repeat the headline at the top of this post; Credit Crisis=Iraq, Paulson=Cheney, Goldman Sachs=Halliburton. To carry this analogy forward, you can look at what happened in Iraq to get a sense of what is likely to happen next to the US economy.

November 20, 2008

The future.

Filed under: Uncategorized — grimgold @ 1:37 pm

http://info.detnews.com/video/index.cfm?id=1189

November 16, 2008

New World Financial Order

Filed under: Uncategorized — alex @ 11:10 am

from www.breadwithcircus.com

This weekend could be one for the history books. A major meeting, the outcome of which could greatly impact all of our lives for the next few decades, is about to take place in Washington. Still-President George Bush has summoned world leaders to spend the weekend deciding on how to reorganize the world’s financial system. This is a desperate effort by world leaders to protect their economies as the pyramid-scheme known as modern banking collapses around them. Some are referencing this weekend as the start of “Bretton Woods Two.” I’m having a hard time understanding just what that is supposed to mean. My eyes glaze over as I try to make sense of documents written in economist jargon and bureaucratese. I don’t know what the leaders are going to come up with, or what it is going to mean for the rest of us. I can hope that the meetings bring about fair and just monetary reform that improves the lives of people. I suspect however, that the politicians will do everything they can to prop up the status quo. It is probable that they will fight for the interests of the coalition of criminal-syndicate banks and multi-national corporations who got us into this mess in the first place. My own instincts and intuition tell me that this summit has big evil written all over it. If the meetings don’t collapse under the weight of the hubris and arrogance of its participants, (still a very good possibility) a big change will be coming, and it may not be the kind of change we need.

The following are some resources that you might look into to better understand what is going to happen.

Bretton Woods 2 FAQ
European Network on Debt and Development

The G20 Leaders Summit on Financial Markets and the World Economy
University of Toronto Munk Centre for International Studies

Bretton Woods Sytem Bretton Woods II
Wikipedia

Group of 20
Financial Times

A New Bretton Woods
The Guardian UK

November 13, 2008

Sarah Palin = frontrunner

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , — Bob Patterson @ 6:52 pm

Now that the 2008 Presidential election is over, it’s time for two new topics.  Who will be the first pundit to officially declare who is the Republican frontrunner and second:  who should be the recipient of that accolade.

 

Since Kurt Godel of the Institute for Advanced Studies has passed away, someone else will have to step up to the plate and volunteer.   

 

With that in mind, and knowing that the members of the Washington Press Corp don’t like to do any work, the World’s Laziest Journalist will volunteer to offer his services to actually do the necessary work.

 

The World’s Laziest Journalist will copyright these phrases:

Sarah Palin is the Republican frontrunner for 2012.ã

Sarah Palin, the 2012 frontrunner.ã

The Republican frontrunner for 2012 is Sarah Palin.ã

 . . . Sarah Palin, the 2012, Republican frontrunner . . .ã

Now, two years hence when the 2010 elections are history and the “one task at a time” national pundits turn their attention to the 2012 Presidential election they will discover that the work necessary to officially consecrate the frontrunner will have already been done for them and (tah-dah) they will also have to pay royalties for using those copyrighted phrases.

 

Sure there will be some market for stories and columns about what Bush might do in the next few weeks and some speculation about will Obama really embrace change or will he validate the French philosophy:  “The more things change, the more they remain the same,” but those two topics seem trite and hackneyed.  Why waste time.

 

When it is time, the Republicans will embrace Sarah Palin as the front runner because she will give them hope of returning to the winning conservative brand of Republican philosophy as personified by Ronald Reagan, and the Democrats will relish the thought of a battle with her because they consider her extremely vulnerable and susceptible to a resounding loss.

 

If the Republicans and the Democrats agree, then it will be up to the national pundits to manufacture a synthetic battle for the nomination in an effort to convince their budget minded editors that they are really worth the money they collect for relaying the information they find on blogs to their audience.

 

Copyrighting the most common phrases describing the anointing of Sarah Palin as the next Republican candidate for President will mean that they have to pay royalties, but they can just put that on their expense accounts and thus bypass the need to do any actual work to evaluate and select the most likely choice for the Republicans in 2012.

 

Now is the time to beat the others and start marketing T-shirts that embrace the official selection of the Alaskan Governor!  The national pundits can put their news organizations’ summer interns on that particular task and return to their favourite gin mill to continue their efforts to emulate the work ethics of William Boot (in the Evelyn Waugh novel “Scoop”).

 

Sarah Palin has said:  “They are also building schools for the Afghan children so that there is hope and opportunity in our neighboring country of Afghanistan.”

Now, the disk jockey will play the Jefferson Airplane’s song “Sarah” and we’ll float off on pleasant memories of the Sixties.  Have a “surrealistic pillow” type week.

November 12, 2008

The Missing Photo

Filed under: Uncategorized — Bob Patterson @ 7:40 pm

mvc-029f.JPG

This photo should have been inseted into the column about Andy Warhol’s Promise.  It shows tourists climibing to the top of the Sydney Harbor Bridge.

(Why can’t you give an Irishman lunch?  It takes too long to re-train them.)

Andy Warhol’s Promise

Filed under: Uncategorized — Bob Patterson @ 7:33 pm

(Sydney NSW) November 13, 2008  Walking past the Macleay Bookshop in Sydney we noticed that a story in the New York Times had mentioned them so when we subsequently saw that they were having a party, we decided that it was time to cover the event for the Bartcop Blog.

http://www.macleaybookshop.com.au/

 

Talking to the folks in the bookstore that has been there since the Fifties, it seemed that:  “The World Is My Neighbourhood” would be a good title for a column about the event because folks in the store knew all about Los Angeles and the surrounding area.

 

One fellow said that his son has just opened a bookstore in L. A. and wanted me to plug the family bookstore

 

Another guy had favoured the Pico area in L. A.

 

Is everything in L. A. world famous?  Does a blogger from L. A. have a chance to become world famous?

 

When we got back to the hostel where we were staying we asked the folks from France and Germany if they had heard of Howard’s World Famous Avocado Burges on Venice Blvd., in L. A.  They hadn’t and asked if I had tried the world famous hotdogs sold by Harry’s on Wheels in Sydney.  Since I hadn’t a trip there was put next on the agenda.

http://aht.seriouseats.com/archives/2005/06/almost_famous-h.html

 

Americans in Sydney eventually find their way to Tomatillo on Darlinghurst Road because (for folks from L. A., at least) there comes a time when you need a fix of burrito and the Tomatillo fills that need perfectly.

http://tomatillo.com.au/site/

  

All this got us to thinking about the subject of fame.  Are all things American famous?  Why haven’t American music fans heard of the band Short Stack?  How easy is it to become a world famous blogger?  We had tried to show some of our new friends our columns and the World’s Laziest Journalist blog.  The columns on Bartcop were easy to find, but even I couldn’t easily find my own blog.

http://worldslaziestjournalist.wordpress.com/

 

After giving a well known Gertrude Stein quote, I had to explain to the younger hostel guests that she was a famous American.

 

Some sports figures in Austalia are national heroes, but since most Americans don’t follow Australian rugby, their names would not be familiar to people in the states.

 

Andy Warhol said that someday everyone would be world famous for 15 minutes.  I’m getting along in years and so it’s time for him to make good on his promise for me (and my blog!)

 

Now, that bloggers have alerted the world and the other media, that President Bush wasn’t the ideal example of a statesman and leader that was offered in the Election ads, will the media biggies (like angry vultures) come along and claim all the credit for exposing Bush as a war criminal and greedy capitalist?

 

If a photographer works hard and gets great images, the ones that people admire most are the ones with celebrities in them.  Does that mean that “celebrity” is a commodity?  Is it tangible?  Can it be shared like in the parable of the fishes and loaves?  

 

Bush is on the way out.  It’s too early to criticize President Obama.  Andy Warhol seems to be welching on his promise.

 

Would anyone like to see pictures taken from the “Pylon” on the Sydney Harbor Bridge?  People pay $200 Australian to climb to the top of the Bridge, but you can’t take your camera with you.  There is no such restriction on the people who go to the Pylon observation deck.

 

Who wants to read a column about the cuts states and cities in the U. S. will have to make in their annual budgets (and the looming necessary cuts in services)?

 

We’ll do some “fact checking” on the incredible shrinking budgets that politicians will be forced to face in the next fiscal year and, in the meantime, try to post a touristy picture from Sydney.

 

Andy Warhol said “In the future everyone will be famous for fifteen minutes.”

 

Now, the disk jockey will play David Bowie’s “Fame,” and we’ll head for the nearest red carpet.  (The premier of “Australia” will be held next Tuesday in Sydney.)  Have a week that makes you famous but not infamous.

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=qpOlaLTXP4E

November 10, 2008

With new generation of voters, time to change the dialogue

Filed under: Uncategorized — Patrick Murphy @ 5:32 pm

Ronald Reagan started his trickle down revolution with a radio program years before his election. Rush Limbaugh and other talk show hosts took the baton in the eighties and successfully convinced millions of middle to upper class Americans that redistribution and consolidation of wealth to an elite minority was not just a patriotic obligation to protect and defend the Constitution but the highest moral gesture a Christian could offer his fellow poverty stricken Americans unfairly hobbled by “New Deal” and “Great Society” economic policies.  Their talking points have not changed in the last 30 years as evidenced by their last minute salvos such as “Redistributionists, socialists, marxists, communists, protectionist and now terrorists”. But in order to prevent the swing back to this oligarchy, we as progressives must change ours. Thanks to the economic disaster brought on by deregulation, I believe more middle and upper middle class Americans are open to progressive domestic and foreign policies. They only need to be convinced that not only is it Constitutional but it’s also OK with God. Deriding their religion or the size of their member should be replaced with rebutals showing their talking points for what they are.  Charges of capital redistribution should be turned back at the accusers who redistribute from the treasury to the wealthy every business day.  This country’s most basic unalienable right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness was fought over and should be the pre-eminent civil right that cannot be trampled on by even a voting majority. The battle cry to shrink Government should be revealed for what it really is. The unconstitutional effort to deny the majority of American citizens representation. The insistence that wealthy Americans should be allowed to keep “their” money should be answered by reminding them that their money is minted by the Federal Govt. which functions only by the consent of the Governed. Therefor it belongs to all American citizens and should find it’s way to the pockets of the wealthy only if they provide life sustaining services to American citizens. Even now hundreds of billions of dollars belonging to the future of American citizens are being redistributed to the wealthy who not only are not providing anything of value, their intended purpose to provide credit to American citizens will be denied because of the proliferation of bad credit from individuals to municipalities produced by the current economic meltdown. The recipients of these ill gotten gains should be prosecuted and sentenced not to prison where they have their expenses paid but to a lifetime of minimum wage. Lets see them pull themselves up by their bootstraps then.  

November 9, 2008

What if…

Filed under: Uncategorized — Peregrin @ 6:13 am

Glad it didn’t turn out this way.

If McCain’s Concession Speech Was As Bitter As His Campaign

Though I have to wonder if this is what his supporters actually heard.

November 8, 2008

Fashion Police

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , — Alwyn @ 12:30 am

Word’s out on the net that ‘Mrs. O’ made a fashion mistake with her ‘black widow’ looking dress. Other people think she looks hot. Which is it? Who cares? I wished I looked that good for people to complain about my outfit like that.

What I liked about it was the way she combined her colors with her husband and her children’s outfits. They were color coordinated with Barack and one daughter in black, the other daughter in red, and looking great. I wasn’t seeing ‘black widow spider’. I was seeing Mamma Obama in the middle. The woman that holds the family together, and in great style, too, I might add, in spite of the fashion police. I guess if we pick our presidents (or their wives) according to fashion, we deserve what we get. (Wasn’t Bush ‘fashionable’ for a while?) At the very least, if that’s the case, I’m going to have to study up…. I wonder what’s the latest colors in mud boots?

country girl reportin’ from the muddy country tonight, where we sit about around the wood fire and say to each other still, pickin’ and grinnin’…. wasn’t that election grand?

November 5, 2008

Now what?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — Bob Patterson @ 7:37 pm

Now that Bush is in the lame duck phase, it is time to answer the really big question:  What will happen on the Bart Cop website after the Inauguration?

 

Will BC-columnists question President Obama if there isn’t a quick move to try Bush for war crimes? 

 

What will Bill O’Reilly say if Bush is tried for war crimes?

 

Would Bill O’Reilly and Dennis Miller be eligible for consideration for less charges such as collaboration? 

 

Is it time to start writing movie reviews for Bart Cop?

 

This is more disconcerting and frightening than the Bush era because at least when Bush was pushing the voters around, a columnist knew what had to be done:  Bush-bash over and over until many of the folks finally realized that something was going terribly awry and corrective measures had to be taken.

 

Would the folks in the USA like a column about the fact that in Australia, a person can buy French Fries from a vending machine?

 

http://worldslaziestjournalist.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/vending-machine-for-french-fries/

 

Maybe George W. Bush will bomb Iran while he is still in office and then the bloggers will have something to discuss.

 

Stay tuned . . .

Step One, Check

Filed under: Uncategorized — Obi Zen Folksinger @ 4:50 pm

Barry speaks. He thanks every body. He thanks McCain for being actually nice. He thanks his family. He thanks his base in broader terms. (The author finds himself too relieved to be snarky)

Barry is an experianced debater and speaker. He talks of glowing platitudes for the happy masses but kicks in the right code words for the smart people. I’m sure everyone reading BartCop is smart enough to have picked them out. I just wanna out line the high points for everybody else. Team work is paired with sacrifice. Responceablility is paired with accountablility. We must work together as a nation but we all know that there is profit in fear and greed.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress