BartBlog

August 19, 2007

Frank Rich: Rove Got Out While the Getting Was Good

Filed under: Opinion — Volt @ 9:02 am

Frank Rich, The New York Times, August 19, 2007

Back in those heady days of late summer 2002, Andrew Card, then the president’s chief of staff, told The New York Times why the much-anticipated push for war in Iraq hadn’t yet arrived. “You don’t introduce new products in August,” he said, sounding like the mouthpiece for the Big Three automakers he once was. Sure enough, with an efficiency Detroit can only envy, the manufactured aluminum tubes and mushroom clouds rolled off the White House assembly line after Labor Day like clockwork.

Five summers later, we have the flip side of the Card corollary: You do recall defective products in August, whether you’re Mattel or the Bush administration. Karl Rove’s departure was both abrupt and fast. The ritualistic “for the sake of my family” rationale convinced no one, and the decision to leak the news in a friendly print interview (on The Wall Street Journal’s op-ed page) rather than announce it in a White House spotlight came off as furtive. Inquiring Rove haters wanted to know: Was he one step ahead of yet another major new scandal? Was a Congressional investigation at last about to draw blood?

Perhaps, but the Republican reaction to Mr. Rove’s departure is more revealing than the cries from his longtime critics. No G.O.P. presidential candidates paid tribute to Mr. Rove, and, except in the die-hard Bush bastions of Murdochland present (The Weekly Standard, Fox News) and future (The Journal), the conservative commentariat was often surprisingly harsh. It is this condemnation of Rove from his own ideological camp — not the Democrats’ familiar litany about his corruption, polarizing partisanship, dirty tricks, etc. — that the White House and Mr. Rove wanted to bury in the August dog days.

What the Rove critics on the right recognize is that it may be even more difficult for their political party to dig out of his wreckage than it will be for America. Their angry bill of grievances only sporadically overlaps that of the Democrats. One popular conservative blogger, Michelle Malkin, mocked Mr. Rove and his interviewer, Paul Gigot, for ignoring “the Harriet Miers debacle, the botching of the Dubai ports battle, or the undeniable stumbles in post-Iraq invasion policies,” not to mention “the spectacular disaster of the illegal alien shamnesty.” Ms. Malkin, an Asian-American in her 30s, comes from a far different place than the Gigot-Fred Barnes-William Kristol axis of Bush-era ideological lock step.

Those Bush dead-enders are in a serious state of denial. Just how much so could be found in the Journal interview when Mr. Rove extolled his party’s health by arguing, without contradiction from Mr. Gigot, that young people are more “pro-life” and “free-market” than their elders. Maybe he was talking about 12-year-olds. Back in the real world of potential voters, the latest New York Times-CBS News poll of Americans aged 17 to 29 found that their views on abortion were almost identical to the rest of the country’s. (Only 24 percent want abortion outlawed.)

Read More Here

Bill Hicks, comic genius, political novice

Filed under: Uncategorized — Bart @ 9:01 am

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8409129199157823217&pr=goog-sl BILL HICKS – A “MUST WATCH” INTERVIEW 1 hr 19 min 52 sec – Apr 20, 2007 Average rating: (96 ratings) Description: I have to give Bill Hicks full credit for waking me up to how the world really works, and this, his last interview includes the footage which proves the Branch Davidians were murdered at Waco, a Bradley tank with a flame thrower attached. This interview was shown on Austin Public Access and has been on Google before, only to be pulled for some spurious reason. If Bill’s friend Kevin Booth is still selling this video then please support his good work (along with Alex Jones) exposing the New World Order, but the information Bill puts across in this interview is too important for humanity to be perceived as having “intellectual copyright”. Bill hardly swears in this interview so there’s no reason for it to be removed for obscenity reasons, if it gets pulled again then it’s the evilarchy, not his friends, followers or disciples requesting it’s removal. Please watch, learn and WAKE UP – There IS a war on for our minds… R.I.P. Bill, you’re my messiah, Vernon was a false prophet!

Bart says: Clinton’s enemies were forced to agree that Vern killed himself and his kids.
The GOP did everything possible to destroy Clinton short of murder, so why would
they help him cover up a mass murder of children?

In the strongest words, Sen Ralston Purina said, “There is 100% proof that the government
DID NOT start that fire,” but there are still those who want to believe the worst.

Obama says, “No fair,” rivals aren’t nicer to him

Filed under: Uncategorized — Bart @ 8:57 am

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070819/ap_po/democrats_debate

 Barack Obama on Sunday accused his presidential rivals of “political maneuvering”
for saying he lacks experience and he insisted he could handle the rigors of international diplomacy.

The candidates began their latest debate by critiquing the freshman senator’s recent comments on Pakistan and whether he would meet with foreign leaders — including North Korea’s head of state — without conditions.

“To prepare for this debate I rode in the bumper cars at the state fair,” the Illinois lawmaker said.   Chris Dodd, directly addressing a question about Obama’s relative inexperience, said: “You’re not going to have time in January of ’09 to get ready for this job.” Dodd has served in Congress for more than 30 years.

Edwards said Obama’s opinions “add something to this debate.” But Edwards said politicians who aspire to be president should not talk about hypothetical solutions to serious problems.

“It effectively limits your options,” Edwards said.  Bill Richardson agreed.

Bart wonders: Are they ganging up on Obama?
How does Hillary get Edwards, Dodd and Richardson to attack Obama?

Mailbag

Filed under: Uncategorized — Bart @ 8:33 am

Dear Bart, Why are you picking on these nice girls who won’t use up your stash while you are going out for Anejo? I think it’s smoking that is unacceptable to females. One young initiate remarked, “it doesn’t taste icky!” after pulling on a water pipe back in ’73. Also rumor has it that THC may be an endocrine disruptor and you know how sensitive females are to a change in hormones. http://cannabis.net/endocrine/index.html
Men as well get our hormones spilled at times when inhaling holy hits of Hawaiian but we(males) probably do enjoy being out of control more than females. So I think your hypothesis is sound at least on the control thing. Give her a drink first then a little smoky smoky. The volcano is nice. Have you been to the vapors yet? http://www.storz-bickel.com/us_home.htm?x=41&y=14 BC Martin

BC, I didn’t write that,
and yes, I’ve been to the vapors.
It’s been 37 years since I seduced a lady :)

Rats desert sinking Bush ship

Filed under: Uncategorized — Bart @ 8:22 am

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/18/us/politics/18cong.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

A rash of retirements among House Republicans is adding to the party’s electoral challenges and raising questions about a rush for the exits.

 

Representative J. Dennis Hastert, with an aide, after announcing Friday in Yorkville, Ill., that he would not run for re-election.

Retirement Watch

Retirement Watch

Four House Republicans — Representatives J. Dennis Hastert and Ray LaHood, both of Illinois; Deborah Pryce of Ohio; and Charles W. Pickering Jr. of Mississippi — have all announced in recent days that they will not seek re-election next year, worrying Republican leaders anxious to hold back a potential wave of retirements after the loss of their majority in 2006. Mr. Hastert, the former speaker, Mr. LaHood and Ms. Pryce were all well-liked leaders within their party.

“I think our party’s chances for winning the majority back next time are pretty bleak at the moment,” Mr. LaHood said in an interview, “and I will admit to you that being in the minority is less fun.”

August 18, 2007

Hacking Starbucks

Filed under: News — Volt @ 8:58 pm

Michael Agger, Slate, August 15, 2007

Perhaps you’ve noticed: The Internet has an obsession with Starbucks. Maybe it’s because the two have grown up together. In 1995, Starbucks had just launched its master plan to become “a third place for people to congregate beyond work or the home,” while the Web had a lot of gray pages with text and “hyperlinks.” Now, the coffee chain has become the new McDonald’s (44 million customers a week), and the Web has become a 24-hour global exercise in collective intelligence gathering. Gourmet coffee culture and Internet culture have fed off each other, and Starbucks in particular has become a punching bag for the indie spirit that pervades the Web. So I wanted to discover who has the upper hand: Does Starbucks dominate us with its convenient locations and potent caffeine, or do we, thanks to the Web, ultimately call the shots?

Exhibit A in the online cheekiness and wariness toward Starbucks is an old monument: the Starbucks Oracle, which went online in 2002. You enter a drink, the oracle spits out a profile. Here’s the response to my regular order, a tall coffee:

Personality type: Lame

You’re a simple person with modest tastes and a reasonable lifestyle. In other words, you’re boring. Going to Starbucks makes you feel sophisticated; you’d like to be snooty and order an espresso but aren’t sure if you’re ready for that level of excitement. … Everyone who thinks America’s Funniest Home Videos is a great show drinks tall coffee.

Sadly accurate. Then I entered Vin Diesel’s drink order: decaf triple nonfat espresso.

Personality type: Freak

No person of sound mind would go to an EXPENSIVE COFFEE SHOP to get a drink WITHOUT CAFFEINE. Your hobbies include going to ski resorts in the summer and flushing $5 bills down the toilet. You are a menace to society.

Read More Here

That Rove Bastard (my title) by Bill Moyers

Filed under: Uncategorized — Bart @ 7:13 pm

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/blog/2007/08/my_fellow_texan.html

Karl Rove figured out a long time ago that the way to take an intellectually incurious, draft-averse, naughty playboy in a flight jacket with chewing tobacco in his back pocket and make him governor of Texas, was to sell him as God’s anointed in a state where preachers and televangelists outnumber even oil derricks and jack rabbits. Using church pews as precincts, Rove turned religion into a weapon of political combat — a battering ram, aimed at the devil’s minions. Especially at gay people. It’s so easy, as Karl knew, to scapegoat people you outnumber. And if God is love, as rumor has it,
Rove knew in politics to bet on fear and loathing. Never mind that in stroking the basest bigotry of true believers you coarsen both politics and religion.

Edwards calls Coulter whore She-Devil”

Filed under: Uncategorized — Bart @ 7:02 pm

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,293711,00.html

Speaking in Iowa, Edwards responded to an attack on wife Elizabeth Edwards dished out by Coulter when he said, “They attacked Elizabeth personally, because she stood up to that she-devil Ann Coulter,” Editor & Publisher reported.

Arctic sea ice shrinks to record low

Filed under: Uncategorized — Bart @ 5:55 pm

 http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070817/ap_on_sc/low_ice 

There was less sea ice in the Arctic on Friday than ever before on record, and the melting is continuing, the National Snow and Ice Data Center reported.

“Today is a historic day,” said Mark Serreze, a senior research scientist at the center. “This is the least sea ice we’ve ever seen in the satellite record and we have another month left to go in the melt season this year.”

Sea ice in the Arctic helps keep those regions cool by reflecting sunlight that might be absorbed by darker land or ocean surfaces. Exposed to direct sun, for example, instead of reflecting 80 percent of the sunlight, the ocean absorbs 90 percent. That causes the ocean to heat up and raises Arctic temperatures.

“It is very strong evidence that we are starting to see an effect of greenhouse warming,” he said.

The puzzling thing, he said, is that the melting is actually occurring faster than computer climate models have predicted.

Why the French Fiat is worthless – Grimgold

Filed under: Uncategorized — grimgold @ 1:25 pm

Several decades ago, the French manufactured, and with a straight face sold, a car. It was called the Fiat. Or at least that’s what I thought. I’ve since been gently but firmly told that the Fiat is made by the Italians. It should have been French, darn it! Why? Because Fiats were motorized garbage cans on wheels, rattling and sputtering down our roads, causing great amusement to everyone except the owners.
Hmmm, perhaps their poor quality had something to do with them being called Fiats.
The word fiat means: by decree, or authorization. For example, a king may, by fiat, declare the opening day of fishing season a holiday (and he should do so).
Or Congress might vote, then get a bill signed by the President, that bans all golf in the United States. So, Congress has the authority to forbid golf by fiat. Incidentally, this also would be a good thing.
Rush Limbaugh should be fishing.
Why am I concentrating on the word fiat?
Because in this country we have fiat money.
What is fiat money?
Worthless dollars, similar to the old Fiat automobile – neither worth a bucket of warm spit.
You should now ask, “How could fiat currency be worthless? I can still buy stuff.”
Only because the Federal Government by fiat, has declared that dollars have worth.
Allow me to explain by contrast:
There used to be another kind of money in the big wide world. Do any of you remember the silver certificate?
There was a time, several decades ago, when anyone could take dollars, which at that time were silver certificates, walk up to the Federal Reserve window and say, “Gimme silver.” You would be handed a small bag of silver in exchange for your silver certs.
Not any more.
So, in economics there are two kinds of money: fiat money and commodity money.
The problem with commodity money is you have to have the commodity, exactly as with the deed to a house, you have to have the house. A deed to a house would be worthless without the house to back it up, or the guarantee that you will get a house.
“Well gee!” you should now say in wide-eyed innocence, “Why would our beloved government with its honest, loving, hard-working bureaucrats and politicians want fiat money? Shoot, they’ve even removed the silver from our dimes and quarters. Why?”
Because dollars backed by gold and silver (called a gold and silver standard) are impossible to inflate – you can’t print silver certificates with wild abandon to pay bills.
And get this now, if the money supply can’t be inflated, bureaucrats are left with only one other option: raising taxes.

And that goes over about as well as Karl Rove at a Hillary for President pep rally.
Raising taxes cost GHWB his re-election bid, remember?
Okay, so are you beginning to understand this a little bit? If you are, it’s beginning to slowly dawn on you that with fiat currency, the Fed has created inflation over many decades, inflation being exactly and precisely the Fed printing more dollars causing each dollar to become worth less.
“Goodness!” You might say. “How could they have gotten away with this?”
Simple – you didn’t understand it. When anyone even breathed the word economics your eyes glazed over. So as our federal government has steadily grown (it’s now the biggest employer in the country) it has quietly inflated our currency to finance itself, counting on you not to understand, or care.

This is real easy stuff:
A commodity based currency cannot be inflated.
A fiat currency can easily be inflated.
So what’s wrong with a little inflation?
Perhaps nothing if you’re rich, aren’t on a fixed income, or like the taste of dog food.
Grimgold

“Heck of a Job” Brownie Makes Big Bucks in Disaster Response Industry

Filed under: Opinion — Volt @ 6:59 am

Mark Silva, The Chicago Tribune, August 18, 2007

WASHINGTON – Nearly two years after Hurricane Katrina overwhelmed New Orleans, Michael Brown, who bore the brunt of the criticism for the federal response to the storm, has moved into a career promoting disaster-response and data-mining technology for government agencies and private customers.

Brown, who served as director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency when Katrina blasted New Orleans and the Gulf Coast on Aug. 29, 2005, has not returned to New Orleans in nearly two years. His last stop was on Sept. 11, 2005, the day before he resigned under pressure.

The next time he sees New Orleans, Brown ruefully suggests, it may be in response to lawsuits resulting from Katrina, which left more than 1,000 dead and tens of thousands homeless.

But while Brown may be gone from government, some of the private companies he now represents say they stand ready to help the government cope with new storms barreling into the Gulf of Mexico, as well as other potential disasters.

Living in Boulder, Colo., Brown has become a traveling salesman for companies selling computer software, high-tech machinery and communications technology. One of the companies focuses on anti-terrorism efforts, trying to help airlines detect potentially dangerous patterns among the flying public. Others specialize in Brown’s old field of disaster response, helping communities rebuild and providing technology so the military and first responders can manage casualties on the ground.

“I probably, at any one time, have a half-dozen clients involved in different things having to do with homeland security or government in general,” Brown said in an interview. “I am called corporate adviser. Some places, I am called vice president for corporate relations. I am called all kinds of names.”

Read More Here

Paul Krugman: Workouts, Not Bailouts

Filed under: Opinion — Volt @ 6:48 am

Paul Krugman, The New York Times, August 17, 2007

In April, Henry Paulson, the Treasury secretary, declared that all the signs he saw indicated that the housing market was “at or near the bottom.” Earlier this month he was still insisting that problems caused by the meltdown in the market for subprime mortgages were “largely contained.”

But the time for denial is past.

According to data released yesterday, both housing starts and applications for building permits have fallen to their lowest levels in a decade, showing that home construction is still in free fall. And if historical relationships are any guide, home prices are still way too high. The housing slump will probably be with us for years, not months.

Meanwhile, it’s becoming clear that the mortgage problem is anything but contained. For one thing, it’s not confined to subprime mortgages, which are loans to people who don’t satisfy the standard financial criteria. There are also growing problems in so-called Alt-A mortgages (don’t ask), which are another 20 percent of the mortgage market. Problems are starting to appear in prime loans, too – all of which is what you would expect given the depth of the housing slump.

Many on Wall Street are clamoring for a bailout – for Fannie Mae or the Federal Reserve or someone to step in and buy mortgage-backed securities from troubled hedge funds. But that would be like having the taxpayers bail out Enron or WorldCom when they went bust – it would be saving bad actors from the consequences of their misdeeds.

Read More Here

August 17, 2007

Volt, China is also giving Wall Street jitters.

Filed under: Uncategorized — grimgold @ 7:25 pm

BEIJING–China’s inflation rate has accelerated to the highest monthly rate in a decade, driven by a 15.4 per cent annual surge in politically sensitive food prices.

Prices of pork and other meat leaped 45.2 per cent and eggs 30.6 per cent in July over the year-earlier period, China’s National Bureau of Statistics reported yesterday.

The month’s inflation rate of 5.6 per cent was the highest since February 1997, and an increase over June’s 4.4 per cent.

Chinese leaders fear the country’s boom – the economy grew 11.9 per cent in the latest quarter – might ignite inflation.

They have tried to cool things off by raising interest rates three times in the past six months, and economists expect one to two more increases this year.

But a statistics bureau spokesperson yesterday tried to quell fears of a pickup in overall inflation, stressing that July’s sharpest increases were limited to food. Prices of clothing and other non-food goods rose just 0.9 per cent in July from a year earlier.

“As industrial-product prices and service prices remain relatively stable, the prices should not rise in an all-around and sharp way,” said spokesperson Li Xiaochao, quoted by the official Xinhua News Agency.

Yao Jingyuan, the bureau’s chief economist, said inflation might continue to rise over the next two months due to food-price hikes, Xinhua also reported.

It said Yao predicted the inflation rate would fall in the final quarter of the year.

Press Secretary Tony Snow Jumps From Bush’s Sinking Ship

Filed under: Opinion,Uncategorized — N @ 7:23 pm

snow.jpg

According to sources, Bush Presidential Press Secretary Tony Snow is jumping from Bush’s sinking ship like that rat he is. In a radio interview Snow said “I’m not going to be able to go the distance, but that’s primarily for financial reasons. I’ve told people when my money runs out, then I’ve got to go.” So Snow, like so many of GOP politicians that leave public service, is leaving for the money. So much for doing your duty for your country.

I would understand if Snow has said he was leaving for health reasons. After all he has battled cancer for a second time and has come out on the winner’s side. Snow cited his kids pending college tuition as one reason to quit. But at the $186,000 he makes per year Snow was not exactly hurting. There are many Americans that would be happy to make that kind of money as they get ready to send their kids to college.

So maybe its not the money. Maybe Snow is sick and tired of going in front of the American people and lying his ass off. On any given day Snow has had to lie a multitude of times. Maybe Snow is sick of Bush’s fake conservatism. Snow after all is a card carrying Reagan conservative, whatever that means.

Regardless of the reason, Karl Rove and Snow have now jumped from the sinking ship just like a rat does. The question now is who is next.

Andrew Leonard: Panic on Wall Street 101

Filed under: Opinion — Volt @ 5:25 pm

Andrew Leonard, Salon, August 17, 2007

From New York to Hong Kong and everywhere in between, alarm bells are ringing. Central bankers are on 24/7 alert, ready to perform life support on catatonic markets. Stock traders are panicking — the Dow’s wild ride on Wednesday, down 350 points and then almost all the way back, is just the latest declaration of confusion and fear.

If you had been paying only casual attention to the financial markets as summer rolled along, you could be excused for glancing at the headlines and wondering, what the hell is going on? By many measures the global economy is growing faster than it has for decades. But in our globalized world, anxiety is everywhere. Soon after the markets close in New York, Asia’s traders start running for cover. By the time they’re exhausted, Europe is picking up the relay. And then back to the United States it comes.

People who devote their entire lives to studying the intricacies of high finance are confused right now. But the basic story line isn’t that complicated once you break it down into simple building blocks. And that’s what Salon is going to do. Here are some simple questions and, we hope, some simple answers.

Q. How did this happen? How did we get here? What does it all mean?

A. There is a standard explanation included as a paragraph in almost every story attempting to explain the current turmoil. It goes like this: Anxious to goose the U.S. economy out of its dot-com-bust doldrums, Alan Greenspan and the Federal Reserve Bank lowered interest rates to rock bottom in 2001. The resulting flood of cheap money encouraged an orgy of borrowing at every level of the U.S. and world economies. Whether you wanted to buy a house or a multibillion-dollar conglomerate, lenders were your best friends, falling over themselves to offer you whatever amount of capital you desired — and charging low, low rates of interest. Cheap money led to a growing complacency about risk. If you ran into trouble, you could just refinance your house, or borrow a few billion more dollars today to pay off the billions you might owe tomorrow.

Greenspan’s policies are being blamed for inciting the greatest housing bubble in U.S. history. The collapse of that bubble set off a wave of defaults by homeowners no longer able to make the payments on their mortgages. Mortgage lenders were the next link of the chain to break, followed by the investors who were trading in bonds and securities whose value was tied to these loans. Suddenly, risk was back!

Read More Here

Your Tax Dollars in Action at the Department of Defense

Filed under: News — Volt @ 4:52 pm

Tony Capaccio, Bloomberg News, August 17, 2007

(Bloomberg) — A small South Carolina parts supplier collected about $20.5 million over six years from the Pentagon for fraudulent shipping costs, including $998,798 for sending two 19-cent washers to a Texas base, U.S. officials said.

The company also billed and was paid $455,009 to ship three machine screws costing $1.31 each to Marines in Habbaniyah, Iraq, and $293,451 to ship an 89-cent split washer to Patrick Air Force Base in Cape Canaveral, Florida, Pentagon records show.

The owners of C&D Distributors in Lexington, South Carolina — twin sisters — exploited a flaw in an automated Defense Department purchasing system: bills for shipping to combat areas or U.S. bases that were labeled “priority” were usually paid automatically, said Cynthia Stroot, a Pentagon investigator.

C&D’s fraudulent billing started in 2000, Stroot, the Defense Criminal Investigative Service’s chief agent in Raleigh, North Carolina, said in an interview. “As time went on they got more aggressive in the amounts they put in.”

The price the military paid for each item shipped rarely reached $100 and totaled just $68,000 over the six years in contrast to the $20.5 million paid for shipping, she said.

“The majority, if not all of these parts, were going to high-priority, conflict areas — that’s why they got paid,” Stroot said. If the item was earmarked “priority,” destined for the military in Iraq, Afghanistan or certain other locations, “there was no oversight.”

Read More Here

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress