Author’s note:
Yes, I realize the events in Japan have much more global significance than the events in Madison, WI, but I am sticking with the story in Madison. The court ruling, while insignificant in terms of stopping the bill(s) from passing, is a clear example that the GOP will push the legal limits in order to further their agenda. One must ask themselves: What would have been the outcome if the courts in Madison were stacked with GOP judges like the courts in most other states?
Excerpt:
Judge Maryann Sumi issued a temporary restraining order in Dane County Circuit Court on Friday blocking a new and controversial law that eliminates nearly all collective bargaining rights for most public employees. While opponents of the bill consider the ruling a victory, proponents say the legal setback is unlikely to prevent the ultimate implementation of the law and the passage of Gov. Walker’s budget bill.
The collective bargaining law cannot go into effect until it is published by Secretary of State Doug La Follette. The ruling delays publication of the law until March 29, when Judge Sumi plans to hold a full hearing on a lawsuit that questions the validity of the law based on the speedy manner in which it was carried out earlier this month. An appeal is possible before then.
The case was brought before Judge Sumi by Dane County District Attorney Ismael Ozanne who seeks to block the law, which Walker signed last Friday, arguing that a legislative committee violated the state’s open meetings law in passing the measure.
Wisconsin’s open meetings law requires a legislative committee to provide public notice of meetings 24 hours in advance, or two hours in emergencies, and allow public access to the meeting.
Ozanne’s suit alleges that the emergency standard did not apply and that even if it did, the meeting did not follow the law because the committee met with less than two hours’ notice. Ozanne also argued that the meeting violated the law because public access was restricted due to tight security at the Capitol and because it was held in a small room unable to accommodate the large crowd trying to get in. Ozanne had to show a probability that the case would succeed on its merits and that irreparable harm would occur if it did not.
Judge Sumi, who was first appointed to the bench by former GOP Gov. Tommy Thompson in 1998, ruled that the meeting was likely to have been held in violation of the open meetings law because a joint Assembly-Senate conference committee did not provide the public with adequate notice before approving the bill March 9.
Opponents of the measure hope the decision is the first of many that would ultimately undo legislation that has split the state and drawn tens of thousands of demonstrators to the capitol over a matter of many weeks. Supporters of the measure suggest the judge’s decision is certain to be overturned as various legal efforts make their way fully through the court system, and is merely a speed bump to the ultimate implementation of the law and passage of the budget bill.
While it is nearly impossible for state Democrats to stop the collective bargaining and budget bills from passing with Republicans dominating all bodies of the state legislature, the ruling today is a minor victory in some respects: It keeps the budget battle in the media spotlight and on the minds of Wisconsinites, it buys time while efforts to recall Republican State Senators, and ultimately Gov. Walker, gain momentum, and shows that state Republicans will push legal boundaries in order to further their agenda.
If recall efforts are successful, both the collective bargaining law and the budget bill can be repealed as early as 2012 and the state constitution can be amended to protect against further assaults on Wisconsin working families by future legislators as early as 2013.
Read more, get links, video and a slideshow here: Madison Independent Examiner – Significance of court order blocking collective bargaining law is debatable
Yay for the new war?
A friend in Concordia Kansas sent an e-mail to this columnist that we interpreted to mean that she was training her Chihuahua dog to participate in a Kansas based Iditarod style race for the breed of dog that we thought would be considered “illegal alien” status in her area. Do dogs need green cards?
It might seem irresponsible and frivolous for a columnist to consider writing a column on the dig topic at a time when the tree huggers are concerned about “an atomic plume” arriving on America’s West Coast and a new “It’s not about the oil” war being added to the gripes of the unpatriots who are celebrating the start of the Afghanistan phase of the perpetual war on terrorism.
We noted a story on the Romensko Media News page at the Poynter website that stated that the Wire Service Guild has asked writers to withhold content and honor the strike against the Huffington Post website. Obviously, the Huffing and Puffing Aggregator website isn’t going to cross post that story and so if we mention it in this column, there is a slight chance that some of our readers (the ones who don’t check Romenesko daily) might not be aware of that development in the strike. [This just in: On Friday, March 18, 2011, Uncle Rushbo reported that the use of by-lines on AP stories is now a labor issue.]
The ego boost allure of crossing the picket line and giving Arianna permission to cross post something isn’t the only dilemma facing bloggers today. Many bloggers will have to wrestle with their conscience and decide if they will recycle an old “It isn’t about the oil” conservative augment from the Bush era and update it to sound relevant to the “no fly” zone military adventure in Libya or will they merely declare President Obama to be the black sheep of the Bush family and consider any effort to protect British Petroleum’s interests in Libya to be a new item for the list of Bush family outrages? If Britain helped the US invade Iraq, doesn’t the USA owe reciprocal military support for BP? Aren’t they a major part of the petroleum industry in Libya?
The prudent thing to do would probably be to hold off on this column and listen to some liberal talk radio shows and take a measure of the depth of their commitment to everything President Obama does or says. Then, if they concur with the effort to send more troops to install democracy in Libya, add our voice to the choir of admiring sheep or should we just dummy up and join in the silence of the lambs?
If Randy Rhodes and the Daily Kos are very adamant in their support of a new Obama military venture, shouldn’t this column disregard the old question about “if all your friends were jumping off the Brooklyn Bridge” and bang out a “one state, one people, one leader” column offering unquestioning commitment to a new war? If they balk at the opportunity to rubber stamp approval of all things Obama, won’t they appear to be subscribing to some weird conspiracy theory cult belief if they don’t “go along to get along”?
It certainly seems that a stance, that would condemn aggression and torture by Hitler and George W. Bush, but not if Obama does it, is a bit of a stellar example of using convoluted logic to rationalize your political views.
For those who are partisan critics of the George W. Bush wars of aggression, it would seem that they are now (metaphorically speaking) caught taking a long lead off first and will fall victim to a pick off throw. If you condemn Hitler and Bush, but make allowances for Obama to do the same thing, you are inconsistent and sound like a conspiracy theory nut.
If, however, you subscribe to the Henry Louis Mencken philosophy that the only way for a columnist to look at a politician is downwards, then it will be perfectly acceptable to ridicule Obama just as enthusiastically as one did George W. Bush during his stint as commander-in-chief.
The squad of Obama cheerleaders will be a bit uncomfortable this weekend, equivocating about how the Libya situation differs greatly from the attacks on Iraq and Afghanistan. If they look to Bush fans for a show of sympathy, they might get a bit of the old “you’re on your own, pal” cold shoulder from the likes of Uncle Rushbo et al because no matter how much Obama tries to imitate George W. Bush, they will always hate Obama and never give him any credit or praise for his efforts to retroactively get the Democratic voters to approve of and support the Bush agenda.
Before this columnist plunges brashly ahead with a sarcastic column that asks what social services programs will have to be scrapped to pay for a new bit of jingoistic colonial empire deployment in the dark continent, we might postpone our efforts and go see the new movie, “Paul,” and see if there might be a few laughs and a way to mix a movie review with some political commentary on it.
Maybe we should send an e-mail to our friend in Kansas and ask for more details about this intriguing but Google search illusive topic of an Iditarod style competition for Chihuahuas?
Maybe we should go buy a Geiger counter and walk around Berkeley CA and see just how accurate the “nothing to worry about” assessments really are? Nah! That makes us sound like a conspiracy theory nut.
If some Americans are going to stage anti-war rallies on Saturday, perhaps we could make an appeal for funds to hold a pro-Obama rally? Aren’t their several really good automobile museums rather close to Nuremburg? If we could get some patriotic well funded organization to subsidize it, we could go over there and (perhaps) do the work necessary to have a picturesque pro-Obama rally of expats?
Hunter S. Thompson coined the folk advice: “When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.”
Now the disk jockey will play “Over there,” “Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition,” and “Just before the battle, mother.” We have to go check out the rumor that the teachers unions, which want smaller classes, are funding the drive to give children the freedom to choose factory work (and $ $ $) over school. Have a “Cathedral of Light” type week.